All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/3] tcp: add one skb cache for tx
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 08:56:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190322155640.248144-3-edumazet@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190322155640.248144-1-edumazet@google.com>

On hosts with a lot of cores, RPC workloads suffer from heavy contention on slab spinlocks.

    20.69%  [kernel]       [k] queued_spin_lock_slowpath
     5.64%  [kernel]       [k] _raw_spin_lock
     3.83%  [kernel]       [k] syscall_return_via_sysret
     3.48%  [kernel]       [k] __entry_text_start
     1.76%  [kernel]       [k] __netif_receive_skb_core
     1.64%  [kernel]       [k] __fget

For each sendmsg(), we allocate one skb, and free it at the time ACK packet comes.

In many cases, ACK packets are handled by another cpus, and this unfortunately
incurs heavy costs for slab layer.

This patch uses an extra pointer in socket structure, so that we try to reuse
the same skb and avoid these expensive costs.

We cache at most one skb per socket so this should be safe as far as
memory pressure is concerned.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
---
 include/net/sock.h |  5 +++++
 net/ipv4/tcp.c     | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index fecdf639225c2d4995ee2e2cd9be57f3d4f22777..314c47a8f5d19918393aa854a95e6e0f7ec6b604 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -414,6 +414,7 @@ struct sock {
 		struct sk_buff	*sk_send_head;
 		struct rb_root	tcp_rtx_queue;
 	};
+	struct sk_buff		*sk_tx_skb_cache;
 	struct sk_buff_head	sk_write_queue;
 	__s32			sk_peek_off;
 	int			sk_write_pending;
@@ -1463,6 +1464,10 @@ static inline void sk_mem_uncharge(struct sock *sk, int size)
 
 static inline void sk_wmem_free_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
+	if (!sk->sk_tx_skb_cache) {
+		sk->sk_tx_skb_cache = skb;
+		return;
+	}
 	sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_QUEUE_SHRUNK);
 	sk->sk_wmem_queued -= skb->truesize;
 	sk_mem_uncharge(sk, skb->truesize);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 6baa6dc1b13b0b94b1da238668b93e167cf444fe..f0b5a599914514fee2ee14c7083796dfcd3614cd 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -865,6 +865,21 @@ struct sk_buff *sk_stream_alloc_skb(struct sock *sk, int size, gfp_t gfp,
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
+	skb = sk->sk_tx_skb_cache;
+	if (skb && !size) {
+		const struct sk_buff_fclones *fclones;
+
+		fclones = container_of(skb, struct sk_buff_fclones, skb1);
+		if (refcount_read(&fclones->fclone_ref) == 1) {
+			sk->sk_wmem_queued -= skb->truesize;
+			sk_mem_uncharge(sk, skb->truesize);
+			skb->truesize -= skb->data_len;
+			sk->sk_tx_skb_cache = NULL;
+			pskb_trim(skb, 0);
+			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&skb->tcp_tsorted_anchor);
+			return skb;
+		}
+	}
 	/* The TCP header must be at least 32-bit aligned.  */
 	size = ALIGN(size, 4);
 
@@ -1098,30 +1113,6 @@ int tcp_sendpage(struct sock *sk, struct page *page, int offset,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_sendpage);
 
-/* Do not bother using a page frag for very small frames.
- * But use this heuristic only for the first skb in write queue.
- *
- * Having no payload in skb->head allows better SACK shifting
- * in tcp_shift_skb_data(), reducing sack/rack overhead, because
- * write queue has less skbs.
- * Each skb can hold up to MAX_SKB_FRAGS * 32Kbytes, or ~0.5 MB.
- * This also speeds up tso_fragment(), since it wont fallback
- * to tcp_fragment().
- */
-static int linear_payload_sz(bool first_skb)
-{
-	if (first_skb)
-		return SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(2048 - MAX_TCP_HEADER);
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int select_size(bool first_skb, bool zc)
-{
-	if (zc)
-		return 0;
-	return linear_payload_sz(first_skb);
-}
-
 void tcp_free_fastopen_req(struct tcp_sock *tp)
 {
 	if (tp->fastopen_req) {
@@ -1272,7 +1263,6 @@ int tcp_sendmsg_locked(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
 
 		if (copy <= 0 || !tcp_skb_can_collapse_to(skb)) {
 			bool first_skb;
-			int linear;
 
 new_segment:
 			if (!sk_stream_memory_free(sk))
@@ -1283,8 +1273,7 @@ int tcp_sendmsg_locked(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
 				goto restart;
 			}
 			first_skb = tcp_rtx_and_write_queues_empty(sk);
-			linear = select_size(first_skb, zc);
-			skb = sk_stream_alloc_skb(sk, linear, sk->sk_allocation,
+			skb = sk_stream_alloc_skb(sk, 0, sk->sk_allocation,
 						  first_skb);
 			if (!skb)
 				goto wait_for_memory;
@@ -2552,6 +2541,13 @@ void tcp_write_queue_purge(struct sock *sk)
 		sk_wmem_free_skb(sk, skb);
 	}
 	tcp_rtx_queue_purge(sk);
+	skb = sk->sk_tx_skb_cache;
+	if (skb) {
+		sk->sk_wmem_queued -= skb->truesize;
+		sk_mem_uncharge(sk, skb->truesize);
+		__kfree_skb(skb);
+		sk->sk_tx_skb_cache = NULL;
+	}
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tcp_sk(sk)->tsorted_sent_queue);
 	sk_mem_reclaim(sk);
 	tcp_clear_all_retrans_hints(tcp_sk(sk));
-- 
2.21.0.392.gf8f6787159e-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-22 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-22 15:56 [PATCH v3 net-next 0/3] tcp: add rx/tx cache to reduce lock contention Eric Dumazet
2019-03-22 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 1/3] net: convert rps_needed and rfs_needed to new static branch api Eric Dumazet
2019-03-22 15:56 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2019-03-22 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 3/3] tcp: add one skb cache for rx Eric Dumazet
2019-04-03  1:17   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-04-03  8:15     ` Eric Dumazet
2019-04-12 14:43   ` [tcp] 01b4c2aab8: lmbench3.TCP.socket.bandwidth.10MB.MB/sec -20.2% regression kernel test robot
2019-04-12 14:43     ` kernel test robot
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 0/3] tcp: add rx/tx cache to reduce lock contention Tariq Toukan
2019-03-22 16:55   ` Eric Dumazet
2019-03-24  1:58 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190322155640.248144-3-edumazet@google.com \
    --to=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=soheil@google.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.