From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.stusta.mhn.de (mail.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1602B79ECE for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:35:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.stusta.mhn.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44Qv584RTPz5c; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 20:35:24 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stusta.de; s=default; t=1553283325; bh=TSPdqs0f7fA43MJs9/XaOseX+A0QMnwbAO59DSrkBJw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=HadyeLCHIoD+Sy9RwRbb6P6lWXFdO5MlBpfBtRakSFu5AahjCZwRzpCHJg3TO+ZrP VkWvglVsxi+PkWsvOGUOxqsDd83RuUT8BTJTYk1jQWYV2FHjNtLjw1rvo6n+lkRenR ZXAouPQ6YuxLz8RERT67OLv6N/uFgtSSF05jX8VIRuJOhenAcqfuDukQe1zehREeR4 d3p4J4vGbmG2/R2ogVnlE6PlWdmWLFb/pyXosvEOiSdteS0F3U37BAG7wO0dV6ff3Y aY1HgoO82b1TPg2wQNGmuO45Ln97J5dZ9eQI+J9WZrxKFY5MZzYatEPl6BtCNZef7p vNrlz3qQ/z4wwHYV5vnm7IjBmY1MHfuWuObeTvqKlBPnEGplTCmPHP7aT8KYzkUYAS zrrby43kv+4lgY5Xr9V0DNLgazkYqqya/LJMXHisUscAmb295ftX+zHe358NcFjURU hReIaTAh2h2bKlz9/l7S893ZIfKHcZeh5Ar9ifKez8jF8agGdv72GpHQTdO9xD7gNq IaK73LDeQfywT+9IIsG1eiOEQEDu0B+TO4cCrEowcjhwBHg2TDYfCd101RFpgj9mIt 96hDmvQ3aKwG5RIzvr0xvk6y1Z2zktGBPu0VCKhD4hI5pErWScIi6foQyfFKnk/Ccm R37JpNEJz2vUWVyhPcf9bdXo= Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 21:35:22 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: akuster808 Message-ID: <20190322193522.GA14099@localhost> References: <4ac23adb-9be1-c09b-7794-54c2dbd04a24@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4ac23adb-9be1-c09b-7794-54c2dbd04a24@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: musl thoughts X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:35:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 07:53:03AM -0700, akuster808 wrote: > On 3/21/19 6:11 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: >... > > As you might guess I'd prefer 3 because: > > + Many patches can go and don't need maintenance on upstream refactoring anymore > > + Burden for people sending patches would be reduced > > + Recipes not building with musl currently might work without further > > modification > > + Just in case musl stops (we have seen this before with others e.g > > ulibc) the cleanup would be reduced > > Didn't we do something like this with glibc? We carried several patches > that where rejected and just recently got removed so there is a > precedent for carrying OE specific changes  so it seems like a > reasonable approach. The glibc patches that got removed were patches where it can be questioned whether they should have ever been applied. glibc still carries far too many patches that simply shouldn't be there. All this is different from the musl situation where some kind of patching is required somewhere at least short-term. > - armin cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed