From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: acpi: Add an example for PRP0001 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:04:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20190325130413.GT9224@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20190322134705.27994-1-thomas.preston@codethink.co.uk> <20190325115118.GP9224@smile.fi.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190325115118.GP9224@smile.fi.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Thomas Preston , Mika Westerberg , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 01:51:18PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:31:13AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:47 PM Thomas Preston > > wrote: > > > > > > Add an example for the magic PRP0001 device ID which allows matching > > > ACPI devices against drivers using OF Device Tree compatible property. > > > It wasn't clear to me that PRP0001 could be used in _CID. > > > > Mika, Andy, can you have a look at this, please? > > Good to me, > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko > > Though one thing I would like to add (not directly related to the patch > per se), i.e. it would be nice to keep such examples under meta-acpi [1] > umbrella as a database for such excerpts. > > Thomas, can you do that? > > [1]: https://github.com/westeri/meta-acpi > > > > + Name (_HID, "TITMP75") /* _HID will appear in sysfs */ Sorry for not noticing earlier. Is this an official ID for the chip? We discourage people to invent ACPI IDs on their own. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko