From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] lib/vsprintf: Add %pfw conversion specifier for printing fwnode names Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:55:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20190326135557.GD9224@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20190322152930.16642-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <20190322152930.16642-6-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <20190322172114.GY9224@smile.fi.intel.com> <20190324181745.vgckevapfwi7mul7@mara.localdomain> <20190326131353.GY9224@smile.fi.intel.com> <20190326133947.pbniwkvszlahw3dr@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190326133947.pbniwkvszlahw3dr@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sakari Ailus Cc: Petr Mladek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Heikki Krogerus List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:39:47PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:13:53PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 08:17:46PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > The patch series by Petr I mentioned takes care about OF case. But it doesn't > > have covered yours by obvious reasons. > > Do you happen to have a pointer to it? Petr, can you share what is the state of affairs with that series? > The behaviour on others is different indeed, you're generally printing a > single item at a time. The question rather is, whether we want to be > compatible with %pOF going forward or not. I'd prefer that, so using the > fwnode API would be easier. I would prefer to mimic %pOF and actually to deprecate it in favour of %pfw. But it's just mine opinion. I'm skeptical about getting support on it. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko