From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] mfd: ti-lmu: Remove support for LM3697 Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 09:18:09 +0100 Message-ID: <20190404081809.GN6830@dell> References: <20190325142403.30447-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20190325142403.30447-5-dmurphy@ti.com> <20190404081736.GM6830@dell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190404081736.GM6830@dell> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Murphy Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com, pavel@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 04 Apr 2019, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Dan Murphy wrote: > > > Remove support for the LM3697 from the ti-lmu > > Bit of an odd place to insert a line feed. > > > driver in favor of a dedicated LED driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy > > --- > > drivers/leds/Kconfig | 2 +- > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 2 +- > > drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c | 17 ----------- > > include/linux/mfd/ti-lmu-register.h | 44 ----------------------------- > > include/linux/mfd/ti-lmu.h | 1 - > > 5 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) > > I'm fine with the patch. > > Can you edit drivers/leds/Kconfig as part of a separate patch please? > Keeping this in sync with this change is not critical and would add a > whole bunch of process which we can really do without. BTW, please add my: For my own reference: Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog