All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, jonathantanmy@google.com,
	jrnieder@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rev-list: exclude promisor objects at walk time
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 11:15:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190409151559.GB12627@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqo95f43dq.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:14:41AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com> writes:
> 
> > For large repositories, enumerating the list of all promisor objects (in
> > order to exclude them from a rev-list walk) can take a significant
> > amount of time).
> >
> > When --exclude-promisor-objects is passed to rev-list, don't enumerate
> > the promisor objects. Instead, filter them (and any children objects)
> > during the actual graph walk.
> >
> > Remove the mark_uninteresting() function as it's not used anywhere else.
> >
> > When testing against a large repo [1], this patch reduces the
> > connectivity check runtime from 3 minutes to ~7 seconds.
> >
> > [1]: https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/base/
> >
> > Helped-By: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
> > Helped-By: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
> > Helped-By: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
> 
> I've dealt with the stray double-sign-off locally, but is there
> anything else planned for v4 or later?  Is this performance-only
> change, or does it have an externally observable behaviour change
> that we can easily add to our test suite?

I am OK if we do not include it, but even if this is "just" a
performance-only change, we can always add to our perf regression suite.

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-09 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-03 17:27 [PATCH] clone: do faster object check for partial clones Josh Steadmon
2019-04-03 18:58 ` Jonathan Tan
2019-04-03 19:41 ` Jeff King
2019-04-03 20:57   ` Jonathan Tan
2019-04-04  0:21     ` Josh Steadmon
2019-04-04  1:33     ` Jeff King
2019-04-04 22:53 ` [PATCH v2] rev-list: exclude promisor objects at walk time Josh Steadmon
2019-04-04 23:08   ` Jeff King
2019-04-04 23:47     ` Josh Steadmon
2019-04-05  0:00       ` Jeff King
2019-04-05  0:09         ` Josh Steadmon
2019-04-08 20:59           ` Josh Steadmon
2019-04-08 21:06 ` [PATCH v3] " Josh Steadmon
2019-04-08 22:23   ` Christian Couder
2019-04-08 23:12     ` Josh Steadmon
2019-04-09 15:14   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-09 15:15     ` Jeff King [this message]
2019-04-09 15:43       ` Junio C Hamano
2019-04-09 16:35         ` Josh Steadmon
2019-04-09 18:04   ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-04-09 23:42     ` Josh Steadmon
2019-04-11  4:06       ` Jeff King
2019-04-12 22:38         ` Josh Steadmon
2019-04-13  5:34           ` Jeff King
2019-04-19 20:26             ` Josh Steadmon
2019-04-19 21:00 ` [PATCH v4] clone: do faster object check for partial clones Josh Steadmon
2019-04-22 21:31   ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190409151559.GB12627@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=steadmon@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.