From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F948C10F11 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621152075B for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731345AbfDJSLm (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:11:42 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:40958 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727431AbfDJSLl (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:11:41 -0400 Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hEHh9-00005Z-G1; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:11:35 +0000 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:11:35 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Linus Torvalds Cc: syzbot , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , linux-fsdevel , Linux List Kernel Mailing , syzkaller-bugs , James Morris , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in path_lookupat Message-ID: <20190410181135.GA32071@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <0000000000006946d2057bbd0eef@google.com> <20190325045744.GK2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20190325211405.GP2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20190325233731.GS2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20190326014552.GY2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190326014552.GY2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:45:52AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 11:37:32PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > > > For debugfs it's clearly "use default ->evict_inode(), have explicit > > ->destroy_inode() using free_inode_nonrcu()" - there we have nothing > > else done in ->evict_inode() and kfree is obviously safe in softirq. > > I'll post that (or push to vfs.git#fixes), along with minimal fixes > > for other 3. If bpf_any_put() is softirq-safe, we'll have the full > > set for -stable and the rest could be done on top of that. > > > > Won't solve the documetation problem, unfortunately ;-/ > > Posted; all of those (as well as Daniel's bpf patch) are Cc:stable > fodder. Documentation is still, er, deficient... ... and unfortunately there are two more, exactly like debugfs - securityfs and apparmorfs, found while sorting out the series for separate rcu-delayed counterpart of ->destroy_inode(). Both are in vfs.git#fixes. Which way should that go - directly or via linux-security.git? Both are stable fodder, in theory, but much harder to hit than their ubifs/debugfs/bpf counterparts...