From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70240C10F13 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 16:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C71A217D4 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 16:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="pbn/XtPF" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3C71A217D4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=/OXtivMddF+9c/g0VLNlty1SP/8r2xVnV03ttGwsHZg=; b=pbn/XtPFhryq3Q 8u0Mmvag5URPcEEvBpJ+qCXovD2c1mTfOaJAR3LXDtaiTt2E9d4u7fvXpTjG7/ZgiT3pw5BV06kGo BCRPOSoKrCMVdSlW661riMQPhOOZoaNKwvWl3634u1zWsjoS8ZUmqQcEQ5gNEQjzAEdK+UEXQpq8d TVKWjpXFDFJ1oYr9HB2G6nbnEY3+SdFnySmT2JFVA3DmErEJKUadE4mfrz8Yb8uiSc4YX+koA1lC8 94ZBOIeZ9pyQxuIexvqqBQKrJTDugzjaXd73oq8fRfctPKkVqQttXqlWssrZOiKa56YDpuJyK8CFD I+fb6xbPMADcgaTaMEiw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hEcbl-00047H-Jt; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 16:31:25 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211] helo=newverein.lst.de) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hEcbi-00046y-G8 for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 16:31:23 +0000 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 0E1C168AFE; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:31:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:31:09 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Nick Kossifidis Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] riscv: remove dead big endian code Message-ID: <20190411163109.GA26533@lst.de> References: <20190411115623.5749-1-hch@lst.de> <20190411115623.5749-3-hch@lst.de> <3382adaf8be0b44af9ebb8b7528cac41@mailhost.ics.forth.gr> <20190411154731.GA23171@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190411_093122_689853_0D68B8A8 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 5.80 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Palmer Dabbelt , Christoph Hellwig Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 07:08:30PM +0300, Nick Kossifidis wrote: > I think we should at least warn the user about unsupported endianess, The endianess is selected by arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/byteorder.h including include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h, which then defines __LITTLE_ENDIAN. So we'd really need to check one part of the kernel port agrees with others, which is a little odd. And in which place do we check that and in which one not? It isn't like other ports like x86 are full of such just because checks.. > also I suggest you also clean up include/asm/elf.h. Agreed. _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv