From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C91C10F13 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:45:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9CB72082E for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:45:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D9CB72082E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3ED2AAB; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 986E52A97 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:44:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39176855 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:44:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id F289E68AFE; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 19:44:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 19:44:31 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [RFC patch 28/41] dma/debug: Simplify stracktrace retrieval Message-ID: <20190411174431.GA32109@lst.de> References: <20190410102754.387743324@linutronix.de> <20190410103646.130022106@linutronix.de> <20190410110818.GA13904@lst.de> <20190411172130.GA30189@lst.de> <20190411133602.17e8ebdf@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190411133602.17e8ebdf@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: x86@kernel.org, LKML , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Alexander Potapenko , Andy Lutomirski , Josh Poimboeuf , Thomas Gleixner , Robin Murphy , Christoph Hellwig X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Message-ID: <20190411174431.jbeKBO-6qs11he0f1Clcc5fHrgV_Dk_fNqunTDTwrxE@z> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 01:36:02PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > I guess the issue is when you get a 41 patch series, and there's only > one patch you need to look at. There's times I get Cc'd on patch sets > that I have no idea why I'm on the Cc. If I skim the patch set and > don't see a relevance, I simply ignore it. I sometimes do that as well, but then again ignoring/deleting is easy. I wish people would think a little more on whom to Cc. In general I don't really need a personal Cc for drive by patches - I'll happily pick them up from the mailing list and actually prefer it that way. But I have received contrary feedback from people that do want to be CCed on every little thing. _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu