All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/getcpu: Add libc sched_getcpu() detection && fix compiler errors
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 11:43:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190412094304.GB28648@haruka.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1555052585-2293-1-git-send-email-xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>

Hi!
> 1)sched_getcpu() isn't defined on some old distros, so we can add dection and
> fix compiler error.
> 
> 2)If CPU_ALLOC isn't defined on some old distros, it will used "include/lapi/cpuset"
> CPU_ALLOC macro. But getcpu01.c has converted into new library, so it will report
> "cleanup" undefine error. We should ensure CPU_ALLOC can be used both new cases and
> old cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  configure.ac                                |  1 +
>  include/lapi/cpuset.h                       | 10 +++++++++-
>  testcases/kernel/syscalls/getcpu/getcpu01.c |  6 +++---
>  3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index de12499..3ac0f28 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ AC_CHECK_FUNCS([ \
>      readlinkat \
>      renameat \
>      renameat2 \
> +    sched_getcpu \
>      sigpending \
>      splice \
>      stime \
> diff --git a/include/lapi/cpuset.h b/include/lapi/cpuset.h
> index b946650..959462b 100644
> --- a/include/lapi/cpuset.h
> +++ b/include/lapi/cpuset.h
> @@ -33,11 +33,19 @@
>  #define LTP_CPUSET_H
>  
>  #ifndef CPU_ALLOC
> +#ifndef TST_TEST_H__
>  #define CPU_ALLOC(ncpus) malloc(sizeof(cpu_set_t)); \
>  if (ncpus > CPU_SETSIZE) { \
>  	tst_brkm(TCONF, cleanup, \
> -		"Your libc does not support masks with %ld cpus", ncpus); \
> +		"Your libc does not support masks with %d cpus", ncpus); \
>  }
> +#else
> +#define CPU_ALLOC(ncpus) malloc(sizeof(cpu_set_t)); \
> +if (ncpus > CPU_SETSIZE) { \
> +	tst_brk(TCONF, \
> +		"Your libc does not support masks with %d cpus", ncpus); \
> +}
> +#endif
>  #endif

Good catch.

I would be happier if we converted the sched_setaffinity01 to new
library then we could simply change the tst_brkm() to tst_brk(), but we
can always do that later on.

>  #ifndef CPU_FREE
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getcpu/getcpu01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getcpu/getcpu01.c
> index eb6ded8..d033119 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getcpu/getcpu01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getcpu/getcpu01.c
> @@ -16,15 +16,15 @@
>  #include <stdlib.h>
>  #include <sys/types.h>
>  #include "lapi/syscalls.h"
> -#include "lapi/cpuset.h"
>  #include "tst_test.h"
> +#include "lapi/cpuset.h"
>  
>  static inline int get_cpu(unsigned *cpu_id,
>  			  unsigned *node_id LTP_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
>  			  void *cache_struct LTP_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
>  {
> -#if defined(__i386__)
> -	return syscall(__NR_getcpu, cpu_id, node_id, cache_struct);
> +#ifndef HAVE_SCHED_GETCPU
> +	return tst_syscall(__NR_getcpu, cpu_id, node_id, cache_struct);
>  #else
>  	*cpu_id = sched_getcpu();
>  #endif

So when __NR_getcpu is not implemented we end up with tst_brk(TCONF,
...) called from the tst_syscall, right? Since AFAIK the getcpu syscall
is not implemented on all architectures...

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-12  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-12  7:03 [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/getcpu: Add libc sched_getcpu() detection && fix compiler errors Yang Xu
2019-04-12  9:43 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2019-04-12 10:46   ` xuyang
2019-04-12 11:46     ` Cyril Hrubis
2019-04-15  5:39       ` xuyang
2019-04-17  6:05       ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] syscalls/sched_getaffinity: Cleanup && Convert to new API Yang Xu
2019-04-17  6:05         ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] syscalls/getcpu:Add libc sched_getcpu() detection &&fix compiler errors Yang Xu
2019-05-13  7:54           ` xuyang
2019-05-13  8:27           ` Petr Vorel
2019-05-13  8:55             ` Cyril Hrubis
2019-05-13  9:40               ` Petr Vorel
2019-04-18 15:27         ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] syscalls/sched_getaffinity: Cleanup && Convert to new API Cyril Hrubis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190412094304.GB28648@haruka.lan \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.