From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A4CC10F13 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324A820684 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729301AbfDPUTw (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:19:52 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:40314 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728000AbfDPUTw (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:19:52 -0400 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1E9D537; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:19:49 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Jeffery , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Jean Delvare , Joel Stanley , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Liviu Dudau , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Michael Ellerman , Paul Mackerras , Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Convert hwmon documentation to ReST Message-ID: <20190416141949.09b48789@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20190411124324.3ed62fad@lwn.net> <20190411174357.251904f5@coco.lan> <20190411210731.GA29378@roeck-us.net> <20190412100451.6fe49de7@lwn.net> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-hwmon-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 20:09:16 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: > The big real-world question is: Is the series good enough for you to accept, > or do you expect some level of user/kernel separation ? I guess it can go in; it's forward progress, even if it doesn't make the improvements I would like to see. The real question, I guess, is who should take it. I've been seeing a fair amount of activity on hwmon, so I suspect that the potential for conflicts is real. Perhaps things would go smoother if it went through your tree? Thanks, jon From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347D2C10F13 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:22:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98BCF20663 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:22:01 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 98BCF20663 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44kGxM2DLszDqFY for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 06:21:59 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net (client-ip=45.79.88.28; helo=ms.lwn.net; envelope-from=corbet@lwn.net; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44kGv03D12zDqG1; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 06:19:54 +1000 (AEST) Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1E9D537; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:19:49 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Convert hwmon documentation to ReST Message-ID: <20190416141949.09b48789@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20190411124324.3ed62fad@lwn.net> <20190411174357.251904f5@coco.lan> <20190411210731.GA29378@roeck-us.net> <20190412100451.6fe49de7@lwn.net> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare , linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, Linux Doc Mailing List , Andrew Jeffery , Sudeep Holla , Liviu Dudau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Paul Mackerras , Joel Stanley , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 20:09:16 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: > The big real-world question is: Is the series good enough for you to accept, > or do you expect some level of user/kernel separation ? I guess it can go in; it's forward progress, even if it doesn't make the improvements I would like to see. The real question, I guess, is who should take it. I've been seeing a fair amount of activity on hwmon, so I suspect that the potential for conflicts is real. Perhaps things would go smoother if it went through your tree? Thanks, jon From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC45C10F13 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (unknown [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFE7020663 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="tjAa+0am" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AFE7020663 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=RyAove4PQTsLo8calOGRezzV093m2K/icRjWRjVwypk=; b=tjAa+0amnaA9EV QDO2bIXLCAXq62GBTBdgivhg0QqH5JE219CH3BTlPtuXZySMb4ok3WkGScqlyWsovRi0i9WlWwUX7 lSm/YDpSg6qnL3vQmBW4O/uPD1vSIjDvi1O/SSMXSGvJMPAHlqVV9FL/6MQXlKh/tRyx/nJ9SLG7I 229AFhH9hk1QtF4n3eSwt9bhtCVilZRU+ZJNXiDlfgcqZyz3+T9hNtPQgqXJ038hw6FzGnco+Fylu q0D4EKeM6K19712lGNvP0dQvCT8Pv5lyRxjaKoOeDVVAYDv1PZMpuXdAogG76T1yyo1ft5hNkouqH YeLftRbl8ETfjjPX0DVA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hGUYg-00065P-FW; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:19:58 +0000 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hGUYe-00064h-6w for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:19:57 +0000 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1E9D537; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:19:49 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Convert hwmon documentation to ReST Message-ID: <20190416141949.09b48789@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20190411124324.3ed62fad@lwn.net> <20190411174357.251904f5@coco.lan> <20190411210731.GA29378@roeck-us.net> <20190412100451.6fe49de7@lwn.net> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190416_131956_256988_839B271B X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.12 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare , linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, Linux Doc Mailing List , Andrew Jeffery , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Sudeep Holla , Liviu Dudau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Paul Mackerras , Joel Stanley , Michael Ellerman , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 20:09:16 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: > The big real-world question is: Is the series good enough for you to accept, > or do you expect some level of user/kernel separation ? I guess it can go in; it's forward progress, even if it doesn't make the improvements I would like to see. The real question, I guess, is who should take it. I've been seeing a fair amount of activity on hwmon, so I suspect that the potential for conflicts is real. Perhaps things would go smoother if it went through your tree? Thanks, jon _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel