From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52815) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGfuZ-0005yE-Ll for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 04:27:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGfuY-0008B3-OT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 04:27:19 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48200) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGfuY-00088N-GN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 04:27:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:27:12 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann Message-ID: <20190417082712.5g5nztxcctembe3z@sirius.home.kraxel.org> References: <20190415154503.6758-1-berrange@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] usb-mtp: fix ObjectInfo request handling List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= , QEMU Developers , Bandan Das , Thomas Huth , Greg Kurz , Eric Blake On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:27:06PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 20:33, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 18:27, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > Having thought a bit more I think I'd definitely like to apply > > > just patch 2 for 4.0. Could people try to test that and confirm > > > that it at least does not make the feature behave any worse? > > > > I've done a tentative merge test of patch 2, which is OK. > > I'd like to push that either today or tomorrow (uk time): > > objections? > > ...now pushed. Added the other two to the (4.1) usb queue. thanks, Gerd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C491EC10F12 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 987BB2073F for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:28:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 987BB2073F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48917 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGfvL-0006Gu-Re for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 04:28:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52815) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGfuZ-0005yE-Ll for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 04:27:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGfuY-0008B3-OT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 04:27:19 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48200) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGfuY-00088N-GN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 04:27:18 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9D9981DE1; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sirius.home.kraxel.org (ovpn-116-65.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.65]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5861D5D6A6; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by sirius.home.kraxel.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 911701747B; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:27:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:27:12 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann To: Peter Maydell Message-ID: <20190417082712.5g5nztxcctembe3z@sirius.home.kraxel.org> References: <20190415154503.6758-1-berrange@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:27:16 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] usb-mtp: fix ObjectInfo request handling X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Huth , QEMU Developers , Greg Kurz , Bandan Das Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Message-ID: <20190417082712.fwKyKuzayD1MUZt1yu6PixwJ5ZuQGZno1RY83xOgC1Q@z> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:27:06PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 20:33, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 18:27, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > Having thought a bit more I think I'd definitely like to apply > > > just patch 2 for 4.0. Could people try to test that and confirm > > > that it at least does not make the feature behave any worse? > > > > I've done a tentative merge test of patch 2, which is OK. > > I'd like to push that either today or tomorrow (uk time): > > objections? > > ...now pushed. Added the other two to the (4.1) usb queue. thanks, Gerd