All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"open list:BLOCK LAYER" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: bio_map_user_iov should not be limited to BIO_MAX_PAGES
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:30:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190418023004.GC9520@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190418021903.GB9520@ming.t460p>

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:19:04AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 01:52:07PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Because bio_kmalloc uses inline iovecs, the limit on the number of entries
> > is not BIO_MAX_PAGES but rather UIO_MAXIOV, which indeed is already checked
> > in bio_kmalloc.  This could cause SG_IO requests to be truncated and the HBA
> > to report a DMA overrun.
> 
> BIO_MAX_PAGES only limits the single bio's max vector number, if one bio
> can't hold all user space request, new bio will be allocated and appended
> to the passthrough request if queue limits aren't reached.
> 
> So I understand SG_IO request shouldn't be truncated because of
> BIO_MAX_PAGES, or could you explain it in a bit detail or provide
> a reproducer?
> 
> > 
> > Note that if the argument to iov_iter_npages were changed to UIO_MAXIOV,
> > we would still truncate SG_IO requests beyond UIO_MAXIOV pages.  Changing
> > it to UIO_MAXIOV + 1 instead ensures that bio_kmalloc notices that the
> > request is too big and blocks it.
> 
> We should pass UIO_MAXIOV instead of UIO_MAXIOV + 1, otherwise bio_kmalloc()
> will fail. Otherwise, the patch looks fine, but shouldn't be a fix if my
> above analysis is correct.

Also we have enabled multipage bvec for passthough IO[1], we shouldn't
need to allocate so big max io vectors any more, and actually the reasonable
number is (PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(struct bio)) / sizeof(struct bio_vec), then we
can avoid to stress mm for high order allocation.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/commit/?h=for-5.2/block&id=489fbbcb51d0249569d863f9220de69cb31f1922

Thanks,
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-18  2:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-17 11:52 [PATCH v2] block: bio_map_user_iov should not be limited to BIO_MAX_PAGES Paolo Bonzini
2019-04-18  2:19 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-18  2:30   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-04-18  8:42   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-04-18  9:29     ` Ming Lei
2019-04-18  9:36       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-04-18  9:43         ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190418023004.GC9520@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.