From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7E9C10F0E for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 13:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EDB217FA for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 13:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="UYHUy5G/" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389168AbfDRNv6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2019 09:51:58 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:53434 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731317AbfDRNv5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2019 09:51:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=P6+OGjDfwKwHsqIDP/h7YfjOTPXy5c3nSVcWGN0O+nQ=; b=UYHUy5G/zyWcCnCLKcH9BnCtk lPpKZCE0BFqrbJJYt6SDaplD0Ruco2J3b0Z5K6/cHedtj30Blr61ZC82EGszH0VPtsFh5yk8eDYj6 7it66fOdpWKHlt/EjW+g9AFyvZyS5JW7KZd22Tk4o+CqVjzVYOQ5eXbdsgo7V6jOyxUITzLSita9G G6rpWK/nYxTBzc+54KtjukKesvDvCBmWCwrl69h+ZLHvgmVXVqF4M/PyEH2lgB6TlBetTHxWCXtB9 D0JlJIaMEGpEgnho1qsCdhpgzMEqmX6qWfbQrRJfQz58G51WnF/L/FXlpursbxuOw6Rgqz+/VhRoc 12mtsMTuQ==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hH7SC-0005OE-Mn; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 13:51:52 +0000 Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0F81329B9B7A0; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 15:51:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 15:51:51 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Waiman Long Cc: Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso , Linus Torvalds , Tim Chen , huang ying Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] locking/rwsem: Guard against making count negative Message-ID: <20190418135151.GB12232@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20190413172259.2740-1-longman@redhat.com> <20190413172259.2740-15-longman@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190413172259.2740-15-longman@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 01:22:57PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem) > { > + long count = atomic_long_fetch_add_acquire(RWSEM_READER_BIAS, > + &sem->count); > + > + if (unlikely(count & RWSEM_READ_FAILED_MASK)) { > + rwsem_down_read_failed(sem, count); > DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(!is_rwsem_reader_owned(sem), sem); > } else { > rwsem_set_reader_owned(sem); *groan*, that is not provably correct. It is entirely possible to get enough fetch_add()s piled on top of one another to overflow regardless. Unlikely, yes, impossible, no. This makes me nervious as heck, I really don't want to ever have to debug something like that :-(