From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:36:43 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vfio-ccw: Prevent quiesce function going into an infinite loop Message-ID: <20190418163643.14bf1cd4.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190417171311.3478402b@oc2783563651> References: <4d5a4b98ab1b41ac6131b5c36de18b76c5d66898.1555449329.git.alifm@linux.ibm.com> <20190417110348.28efc8e3.cohuck@redhat.com> <20190417171311.3478402b@oc2783563651> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Halil Pasic Cc: Eric Farman , Farhan Ali , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, pmorel@linux.ibm.com List-ID: On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 17:13:11 +0200 Halil Pasic wrote: > On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:58:24 -0400 > Eric Farman wrote: > > I like it, but I feel weird giving an r-b to something I suggested: > > > > Acked-by: Eric Farman > > > > I think r-b is fine. You did verify both the design and the > implementation I guess. So I don't see why not. +1, an r-b by a suggestor is completely fine :) > > How urgent is this. I could give this some love till the end of the > week. Should I @Connie,@Farhan? I plan to queue this early next week, so I can send a pull request mid next week.