From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2336EC282DA for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E661A222AF for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="xlbpCLxW" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727701AbfDSSUD (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:20:03 -0400 Received: from condef-05.nifty.com ([202.248.20.70]:50968 "EHLO condef-05.nifty.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727676AbfDSSUC (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:20:02 -0400 Received: from conuserg-08.nifty.com ([10.126.8.71])by condef-05.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3J9nRFx007630; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:49:27 +0900 Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-08.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3J9mDiT012304; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:48:25 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-08.nifty.com x3J9mDiT012304 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555667306; bh=IOsaHpZ2TEvCn87/LKuhI8uONRrcYXXxxmJ0Uzy6UC0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xlbpCLxWCESSMUFlvymWfpdpzfmpBy5siuyjRgmVq4MOlmuBdkmCkRFunf/87D+Au 1teXLYsl6q34ChxzjyXvCzlsrJoL0QOmDdvA0PYKn2s1+aBZS8pV9I/KELak7OVTyN f+VByoV8WYlJ6z4urXSwQi4RsjLCqrlJSjUWFxWAb45SNg+iZ3uNlUqnCLxkfLrQG1 kxiV8SvJ3aboun9kg5RdF9krWujMw6/u9rYWCOyqvYXry6TeFjPgzW0890xmD08dSR elm5jorLBqWDwDRISFcXPZ/HHz5Wd55C/sWn9rwGPBvO8yd/UGH/PczDNCg0HckLw/ OS+qlLF7podNA== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , Arnd Bergmann , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Christophe Leroy , Masahiro Yamada Subject: [PATCH v2 08/11] powerpc/prom_init: mark prom_getprop() and prom_getproplen() as __init Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:47:51 +0900 Message-Id: <20190419094754.24667-9-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190419094754.24667-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190419094754.24667-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for powerpc, the following modpost warnings are reported: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x20): Section mismatch in reference from the function .prom_getprop() to the function .init.text:.call_prom() The function .prom_getprop() references the function __init .call_prom(). This is often because .prom_getprop lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of .call_prom is wrong. WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x3c): Section mismatch in reference from the function .prom_getproplen() to the function .init.text:.call_prom() The function .prom_getproplen() references the function __init .call_prom(). This is often because .prom_getproplen lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of .call_prom is wrong. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c index f33ff4163a51..241fe6b7a8cc 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c @@ -501,14 +501,14 @@ static int __init prom_next_node(phandle *nodep) } } -static inline int prom_getprop(phandle node, const char *pname, - void *value, size_t valuelen) +static inline int __init prom_getprop(phandle node, const char *pname, + void *value, size_t valuelen) { return call_prom("getprop", 4, 1, node, ADDR(pname), (u32)(unsigned long) value, (u32) valuelen); } -static inline int prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *pname) +static inline int __init prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *pname) { return call_prom("getproplen", 2, 1, node, ADDR(pname)); } -- 2.17.1 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Masahiro Yamada Subject: [PATCH v2 08/11] powerpc/prom_init: mark prom_getprop() and prom_getproplen() as __init Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:47:51 +0900 Message-ID: <20190419094754.24667-9-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190419094754.24667-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190419094754.24667-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+gldm-linux-mtd-36=gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Cc: Christophe Leroy , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for powerpc, the following modpost warnings are reported: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x20): Section mismatch in reference from the function .prom_getprop() to the function .init.text:.call_prom() The function .prom_getprop() references the function __init .call_prom(). This is often because .prom_getprop lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of .call_prom is wrong. WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x3c): Section mismatch in reference from the function .prom_getproplen() to the function .init.text:.call_prom() The function .prom_getproplen() references the function __init .call_prom(). This is often because .prom_getproplen lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of .call_prom is wrong. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c index f33ff4163a51..241fe6b7a8cc 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c @@ -501,14 +501,14 @@ static int __init prom_next_node(phandle *nodep) } } -static inline int prom_getprop(phandle node, const char *pname, - void *value, size_t valuelen) +static inline int __init prom_getprop(phandle node, const char *pname, + void *value, size_t valuelen) { return call_prom("getprop", 4, 1, node, ADDR(pname), (u32)(unsigned long) value, (u32) valuelen); } -static inline int prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *pname) +static inline int __init prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *pname) { return call_prom("getproplen", 2, 1, node, ADDR(pname)); } -- 2.17.1 ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C3BC282DA for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BDEB218FE for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="xlbpCLxW" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8BDEB218FE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44lryH3LLSzDqLN for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:58:15 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.75; helo=conuserg-08.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="xlbpCLxW"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-08.nifty.com (conuserg-08.nifty.com [210.131.2.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44lrlp1CxrzDqTQ for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:49:09 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-08.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3J9mDiT012304; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:48:25 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-08.nifty.com x3J9mDiT012304 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555667306; bh=IOsaHpZ2TEvCn87/LKuhI8uONRrcYXXxxmJ0Uzy6UC0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xlbpCLxWCESSMUFlvymWfpdpzfmpBy5siuyjRgmVq4MOlmuBdkmCkRFunf/87D+Au 1teXLYsl6q34ChxzjyXvCzlsrJoL0QOmDdvA0PYKn2s1+aBZS8pV9I/KELak7OVTyN f+VByoV8WYlJ6z4urXSwQi4RsjLCqrlJSjUWFxWAb45SNg+iZ3uNlUqnCLxkfLrQG1 kxiV8SvJ3aboun9kg5RdF9krWujMw6/u9rYWCOyqvYXry6TeFjPgzW0890xmD08dSR elm5jorLBqWDwDRISFcXPZ/HHz5Wd55C/sWn9rwGPBvO8yd/UGH/PczDNCg0HckLw/ OS+qlLF7podNA== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v2 08/11] powerpc/prom_init: mark prom_getprop() and prom_getproplen() as __init Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:47:51 +0900 Message-Id: <20190419094754.24667-9-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190419094754.24667-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190419094754.24667-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for powerpc, the following modpost warnings are reported: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x20): Section mismatch in reference from the function .prom_getprop() to the function .init.text:.call_prom() The function .prom_getprop() references the function __init .call_prom(). This is often because .prom_getprop lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of .call_prom is wrong. WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x3c): Section mismatch in reference from the function .prom_getproplen() to the function .init.text:.call_prom() The function .prom_getproplen() references the function __init .call_prom(). This is often because .prom_getproplen lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of .call_prom is wrong. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c index f33ff4163a51..241fe6b7a8cc 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c @@ -501,14 +501,14 @@ static int __init prom_next_node(phandle *nodep) } } -static inline int prom_getprop(phandle node, const char *pname, - void *value, size_t valuelen) +static inline int __init prom_getprop(phandle node, const char *pname, + void *value, size_t valuelen) { return call_prom("getprop", 4, 1, node, ADDR(pname), (u32)(unsigned long) value, (u32) valuelen); } -static inline int prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *pname) +static inline int __init prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *pname) { return call_prom("getproplen", 2, 1, node, ADDR(pname)); } -- 2.17.1 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5AEC282DA for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 645FC218EA for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="lqpNCBT0"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="xlbpCLxW" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 645FC218EA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=tB1Vn5xf4b/G6R9ODajSoyeRC4HksSbdYa5j8SwS8Mo=; b=lqpNCBT0BwnOIxjw0Wr0QzqUYO RZ3NPiFHVzA4DJxBa6aoLL80luk7Epf3iZBRyDqOUJzhVrKaoy2XyC/AM8hx0Y9zT2BQNRxjYR+Kl Clw2p212olRYm1K/+ZBAD4s7L/lj9kjaPxpEj9Y6Sl0xTkMk2V4pFuSA3ZLx5onzrP9zJqbOoajfW QaBfiNzJUd1MjJnwMtP2TOP7sVTXC+LjF2E3/YKKrx1Ii3m9d0d/OtF6vSKa8D+Nw24RlG82LUWtB 6pUjxcqcSO82Het6Uso/1wzO2HXLNfHS+1ttAE8og7mWWGKXKmGXUAWy/CZE0768Zk1Qq4Mp9mDYt qVsGTgbg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hHQAT-0001ft-Jd; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:50:49 +0000 Received: from conuserg-08.nifty.com ([210.131.2.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hHQ8a-0006aI-8e; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:48:55 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-08.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3J9mDiT012304; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:48:25 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-08.nifty.com x3J9mDiT012304 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555667306; bh=IOsaHpZ2TEvCn87/LKuhI8uONRrcYXXxxmJ0Uzy6UC0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xlbpCLxWCESSMUFlvymWfpdpzfmpBy5siuyjRgmVq4MOlmuBdkmCkRFunf/87D+Au 1teXLYsl6q34ChxzjyXvCzlsrJoL0QOmDdvA0PYKn2s1+aBZS8pV9I/KELak7OVTyN f+VByoV8WYlJ6z4urXSwQi4RsjLCqrlJSjUWFxWAb45SNg+iZ3uNlUqnCLxkfLrQG1 kxiV8SvJ3aboun9kg5RdF9krWujMw6/u9rYWCOyqvYXry6TeFjPgzW0890xmD08dSR elm5jorLBqWDwDRISFcXPZ/HHz5Wd55C/sWn9rwGPBvO8yd/UGH/PczDNCg0HckLw/ OS+qlLF7podNA== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v2 08/11] powerpc/prom_init: mark prom_getprop() and prom_getproplen() as __init Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:47:51 +0900 Message-Id: <20190419094754.24667-9-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190419094754.24667-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190419094754.24667-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190419_024852_721487_B7B2B46A X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.66 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Christophe Leroy , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for powerpc, the following modpost warnings are reported: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x20): Section mismatch in reference from the function .prom_getprop() to the function .init.text:.call_prom() The function .prom_getprop() references the function __init .call_prom(). This is often because .prom_getprop lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of .call_prom is wrong. WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x3c): Section mismatch in reference from the function .prom_getproplen() to the function .init.text:.call_prom() The function .prom_getproplen() references the function __init .call_prom(). This is often because .prom_getproplen lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of .call_prom is wrong. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c index f33ff4163a51..241fe6b7a8cc 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c @@ -501,14 +501,14 @@ static int __init prom_next_node(phandle *nodep) } } -static inline int prom_getprop(phandle node, const char *pname, - void *value, size_t valuelen) +static inline int __init prom_getprop(phandle node, const char *pname, + void *value, size_t valuelen) { return call_prom("getprop", 4, 1, node, ADDR(pname), (u32)(unsigned long) value, (u32) valuelen); } -static inline int prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *pname) +static inline int __init prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *pname) { return call_prom("getproplen", 2, 1, node, ADDR(pname)); } -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel