From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> To: WANG Chao <chao.wang@ucloud.cn> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] RAS/CEC: immediate soft-offline page when count_threshold == 1 Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 13:57:19 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190420115719.GD29704@zn.tnic> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190418034115.75954-3-chao.wang@ucloud.cn> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:41:15AM +0800, WANG Chao wrote: > count_threshol == 1 isn't working as expected. CEC only does soft > offline the second time the same pfn is hit by a correctable error. So this? --- diff --git a/drivers/ras/cec.c b/drivers/ras/cec.c index b3c377ddf340..750a427e1a73 100644 --- a/drivers/ras/cec.c +++ b/drivers/ras/cec.c @@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ int cec_add_elem(u64 pfn) mutex_lock(&ce_mutex); + /* Array full, free the LRU slot. */ if (ca->n == MAX_ELEMS) WARN_ON(!del_lru_elem_unlocked(ca)); @@ -346,14 +347,9 @@ int cec_add_elem(u64 pfn) (void *)&ca->array[to], (ca->n - to) * sizeof(u64)); - ca->array[to] = (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) | - (DECAY_MASK << COUNT_BITS) | 1; + ca->array[to] = (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) | 1; ca->n++; - - ret = 0; - - goto decay; } count = COUNT(ca->array[to]); @@ -386,7 +382,6 @@ int cec_add_elem(u64 pfn) goto unlock; } -decay: ca->decay_count++; if (ca->decay_count >= CLEAN_ELEMS) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> To: WANG Chao <chao.wang@ucloud.cn> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org Subject: [3/3] RAS/CEC: immediate soft-offline page when count_threshold == 1 Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 13:57:19 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190420115719.GD29704@zn.tnic> (raw) On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:41:15AM +0800, WANG Chao wrote: > count_threshol == 1 isn't working as expected. CEC only does soft > offline the second time the same pfn is hit by a correctable error. So this? diff --git a/drivers/ras/cec.c b/drivers/ras/cec.c index b3c377ddf340..750a427e1a73 100644 --- a/drivers/ras/cec.c +++ b/drivers/ras/cec.c @@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ int cec_add_elem(u64 pfn) mutex_lock(&ce_mutex); + /* Array full, free the LRU slot. */ if (ca->n == MAX_ELEMS) WARN_ON(!del_lru_elem_unlocked(ca)); @@ -346,14 +347,9 @@ int cec_add_elem(u64 pfn) (void *)&ca->array[to], (ca->n - to) * sizeof(u64)); - ca->array[to] = (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) | - (DECAY_MASK << COUNT_BITS) | 1; + ca->array[to] = (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) | 1; ca->n++; - - ret = 0; - - goto decay; } count = COUNT(ca->array[to]); @@ -386,7 +382,6 @@ int cec_add_elem(u64 pfn) goto unlock; } -decay: ca->decay_count++; if (ca->decay_count >= CLEAN_ELEMS)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-20 11:57 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-04-18 3:41 [PATCH 1/3] RAS/CEC: fix __find_elem WANG Chao 2019-04-18 3:41 ` [1/3] " WANG Chao 2019-04-18 3:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] RAS/CEC: make ces_entered smp safe WANG Chao 2019-04-18 3:41 ` [2/3] " WANG Chao 2019-04-20 10:19 ` [tip:ras/core] RAS/CEC: Increment cec_entered under the mutex lock tip-bot for WANG Chao 2019-04-20 10:19 ` tip-bot for Borislav Petkov 2019-04-20 10:22 ` tip-bot for WANG Chao 2019-04-20 10:22 ` tip-bot for Borislav Petkov 2019-04-18 3:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] RAS/CEC: immediate soft-offline page when count_threshold == 1 WANG Chao 2019-04-18 3:41 ` [3/3] " WANG Chao 2019-04-20 11:57 ` Borislav Petkov [this message] 2019-04-20 11:57 ` Borislav Petkov 2019-04-24 2:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] " WANG Chao 2019-04-24 2:43 ` [3/3] " WANG Chao 2019-04-24 10:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] " Borislav Petkov 2019-04-24 10:26 ` [3/3] " Borislav Petkov 2019-06-08 21:26 ` [tip:ras/core] RAS/CEC: Check count_threshold unconditionally tip-bot for Borislav Petkov 2019-04-25 7:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] RAS/CEC: fix __find_elem WANG Chao 2019-04-25 7:56 ` [1/3] " WANG Chao 2019-04-25 8:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] " WANG Chao 2019-04-25 8:05 ` [1/3] " WANG Chao
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190420115719.GD29704@zn.tnic \ --to=bp@alien8.de \ --cc=chao.wang@ucloud.cn \ --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.