From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FAF4C10F03 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34EFF217D9 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729159AbfDWQpF (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:45:05 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:49970 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727656AbfDWQpF (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:45:05 -0400 Received: from bigeasy by Galois.linutronix.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hIyXQ-0003zN-13; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 18:44:56 +0200 Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 18:44:55 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Thomas Gleixner , kbuild test robot , kbuild-all@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [rcu:dev.2019.04.16a 38/72] kernel/rcu/tree.c:2408:36: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) Message-ID: <20190423164455.gpaqksylv7ui3gxq@linutronix.de> References: <201904231828.a3jAyl28%lkp@intel.com> <20190423124619.GH3923@linux.ibm.com> <20190423150814.4lhcavywthyiwipd@linutronix.de> <20190423163809.GQ3923@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190423163809.GQ3923@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019-04-23 09:38:09 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Ah, thank you! Shall I fold the above patch into your existing one, > or are you looking to do something else here? The problem (that has been reported) isn't introduced by the patch in question but existed since the very beginning. I intend to post a patch with proper description. > Thanx, Paul Sebastian