From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72CC2C43219 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57782067D for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728233AbfDYPVH (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Apr 2019 11:21:07 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:40788 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728227AbfDYPVG (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Apr 2019 11:21:06 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41E7AEE2; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:21:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id 111A1DA847; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 17:22:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 17:22:07 +0200 From: David Sterba To: Josef Bacik Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ENOSPC refinements Message-ID: <20190425152206.GK20156@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Josef Bacik , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <20190410195610.84110-1-josef@toxicpanda.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190410195610.84110-1-josef@toxicpanda.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 03:56:08PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > I noticed our continuous testing for btrfs started timing out recently, and dug > down to discover that generic/224 was taking upwards of an hour to run. This > test should take seconds to run, so this is a problem. > > Fix this by reworking how we do delalloc metadata reservations, as described in > patch 2/2. > > I also noticed we don't quite do the right thing when we are mostly O_DIRECT, > and addressed this in patch 1/2. I've run these through xfstests and everything > is back to normal. Thanks, The patches have been in for-next for some time, I'd like to merge them to 5.2 queue. Please update the changelogs, either post just the text or whole patches. Thanks.