From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
jack@suse.com, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: Re: [RT WARNING] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current) with fsfreeze (4.19.25-rt16)
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 13:42:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190502114258.GB7323@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190502100932.GA7323@redhat.com>
On 05/02, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> But this all is cosmetic, it seems that we can remove ->rw_sem altogether
> but I am not sure...
I mean, afaics percpu_down_read() can just do
wait_event(readers_block == 0);
in the slow path, while percpu_down_write()
wait_even_exclusive(xchg(readers_block, 1) == 0);
we do not really need ->rw_sem if we rely on wait_queue_head.
But in fact, either way it seems that we going to implement another simple
"non owner" read/write lock, so perhaps we should do this explicitly?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-02 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-26 9:34 [RT WARNING] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current) with fsfreeze (4.19.25-rt16) Juri Lelli
2019-03-28 10:17 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-04-19 8:56 ` Juri Lelli
2019-04-30 12:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-04-30 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-30 13:45 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-04-30 14:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-30 14:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-04-30 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-30 14:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-04-30 14:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-30 14:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-01 17:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-01 17:26 ` Waiman Long
2019-05-01 18:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-01 19:22 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2019-05-01 19:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-02 10:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-02 11:42 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2019-05-03 14:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-03 15:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-06 16:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-19 9:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-03 14:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-03 15:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-03 15:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190502114258.GB7323@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.