From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8160C04A6B for ; Mon, 6 May 2019 14:51:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7684C2053B for ; Mon, 6 May 2019 14:51:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="AXTDnLjU" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729602AbfEFOv3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2019 10:51:29 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f193.google.com ([209.85.222.193]:33747 "EHLO mail-qk1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729483AbfEFOvU (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2019 10:51:20 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f193.google.com with SMTP id k189so788271qkc.0; Mon, 06 May 2019 07:51:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EUqbtnBDML3NXPrwjM3lOcCy0+gNa0GHK0Zw6wsv7vk=; b=AXTDnLjU4V5dPhIaqTfxEvyLYGM6Ju3eFNv0qIjyCiDhH80SqzSBl8gqCzk71+F8En 6FZBzMHUG20Ea88H/H4v3tV6iodGgF81A4RWwPpTJptIvVzUiMQUN3vx/S2PGtidPIVu txpEda5KDfCAQvKaGidI40u3a2CT6ltxytWXxIgllylF3HU7mFmHw2Z3Lhy59yXdMvLM y6v6ykITIP9UnL7CtW8v+klC7wr/X2vN5DT1hSv9JjdgeBNj78eEV77CVowZfYziAiGs 24NBtWK6UJTL7Z4R7jdP+qXnenOUqbd0eKNm0fGpbpg8kRu6C9MHRRt8KVF/35B4F8N/ wEQA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EUqbtnBDML3NXPrwjM3lOcCy0+gNa0GHK0Zw6wsv7vk=; b=BBSKYS91VIRrvwbeJ/IEG5BZT5sFbgDcbDcbikYZPQ/PWwiMnwfF1BZ30qeWbw46as 8+AXx+e6XlpS+IJAy2Zf1Ougm2IYP+2Rt+Lrh7KUUBwpbw8Y9DLHWDFnJmKvC4Kqp8os DYXCobpAH/bJLqoe9Fa903h5V1I3dlo2i0wVaM7df3DmTIYLRh5N3fr0Q0gaE4hKlvyA oEJIKqA6nOVpK31aDXonlciehtea0wwRlETwFswzvtFqR4LZfqaj/+zMZ1C9dTgW4IAp zsblnQjyWAy3xkJMw2QAneHVKTyaDGR/1unOowkBqQZiC9/6jocoyQthoZauJR4KlvIf 5RPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWMbzkMPXvbghZbWd7NMMQyRu5hFO0ZHQ9AgTMpi9YrC7mbIHy4 VNTT6qERaidtOZPYa3gpIP8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxTY7WCj2xqd8jZnjpQFVhDqMsXc162OV4Ev36zk054hC0qFGnC4etgldMyVboC8w5Y9MBvNA== X-Received: by 2002:a37:52c1:: with SMTP id g184mr11795366qkb.338.1557154279804; Mon, 06 May 2019 07:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (modemcable249.105-163-184.mc.videotron.ca. [184.163.105.249]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m62sm5695639qkd.68.2019.05.06.07.51.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 May 2019 07:51:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 10:51:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20190506105117.GB24823@t480s.localdomain> From: Vivien Didelot To: Rasmus Villemoes Cc: Andrew Lunn , LKML , Network Development Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: rename smi read/write functions In-Reply-To: <8d14f3e0-4b95-900c-55f0-dfff30ae655f@prevas.dk> References: <20190501193126.19196-1-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk> <20190501193126.19196-3-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk> <20190503175732.GB4060@t480s.localdomain> <8d14f3e0-4b95-900c-55f0-dfff30ae655f@prevas.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Rasmus, On Mon, 6 May 2019 05:57:11 +0000, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > I have a preparatory patch which does almost exactly that. I'm sending it > > to simplify this patchset. > > OK, I'll hold off sending a v2 until I see how 1/5 and 2/5 are obsoleted > by your patch(es). You may rebase your patches now and add your new implementation of register access through SMI in the smi.c file if that is necessary. Thanks, Vivien