From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] s390/cio: Remove vfio-ccw checks of command codes
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 18:31:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190506183152.53cf9d32.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6f28324-846f-54b6-84f0-c97e474361c1@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, 6 May 2019 12:25:01 -0400
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 5/6/19 12:18 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > [1] tcws are a bit different; but we don't support them anyway.
> >
>
> Yeah... I'd like to get the code cleaned up to a point where if we want
> to support TCWs, we could just up front say "if command go here, if
> transport go there." Not that that'll be anytime soon, but it would
> prevent us from having to dis-entangle everything at that future point.
>
Let's see how much work that is :)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-06 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-03 13:49 [PATCH v1 0/7] s390: vfio-ccw fixes Eric Farman
2019-05-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 1/7] s390/cio: Update SCSW if it points to the end of the chain Eric Farman
2019-05-06 14:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-06 15:23 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 2/7] s390/cio: Set vfio-ccw FSM state before ioeventfd Eric Farman
2019-05-06 14:51 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-06 16:36 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-07 8:32 ` Pierre Morel
2019-05-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 3/7] s390/cio: Split pfn_array_alloc_pin into pieces Eric Farman
2019-05-08 10:43 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-08 13:25 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-08 13:36 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 4/7] s390/cio: Initialize the host addresses in pfn_array Eric Farman
2019-05-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 5/7] s390/cio: Allow zero-length CCWs in vfio-ccw Eric Farman
2019-05-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 6/7] s390/cio: Don't pin vfio pages for empty transfers Eric Farman
2019-05-06 15:20 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-06 15:40 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 7/7] s390/cio: Remove vfio-ccw checks of command codes Eric Farman
2019-05-06 12:56 ` Pierre Morel
2019-05-06 15:39 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-06 20:47 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-07 8:52 ` Pierre Morel
2019-05-07 16:43 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-08 9:22 ` Pierre Morel
2019-05-08 10:06 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-08 19:38 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-10 11:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-10 14:24 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-14 14:29 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-14 18:29 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-06 15:37 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-06 15:46 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-06 16:18 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-06 16:25 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-06 16:31 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190506183152.53cf9d32.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.