From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D10BCC04AA7 for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 01:45:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 597592089E for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 01:45:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 597592089E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=git.icu Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4530rX2jRGzDqLD for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 11:45:48 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=git.icu (client-ip=163.172.180.134; helo=git.icu; envelope-from=shawn@git.icu; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=git.icu Received: from git.icu (git.icu [163.172.180.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4530q10vxnzDqGN for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 11:44:27 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (minicloud.parqtec.unicamp.br [143.106.167.126]) by git.icu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8356E220723; Tue, 14 May 2019 01:44:20 +0000 (UTC) From: Shawn Landden To: Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [PowerPC] Add simd.h implementation Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 22:44:11 -0300 Message-Id: <20190514014412.25373-1-shawn@git.icu> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0.1020.gf2820cf01a In-Reply-To: <20190513005104.20140-1-shawn@git.icu> References: <20190513005104.20140-1-shawn@git.icu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Shawn Landden , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Based off the x86 one. WireGuard really wants to be able to do SIMD in interrupts, so it can accelerate its in-bound path. Signed-off-by: Shawn Landden --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/simd.h | 13 +++++++++++++ arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/simd.h diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/simd.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/simd.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2c02ad531 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/simd.h @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */ + +/* + * may_use_simd - whether it is allowable at this time to issue SIMD + * instructions or access the SIMD register file + * + * It's always ok in process context (ie "not interrupt") + * but it is sometimes ok even from an irq. + */ +static __must_check inline bool may_use_simd(void) +{ + return irq_simd_usable(); +} diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c index dd9e0d538..e436d708a 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c @@ -345,6 +345,36 @@ static int restore_altivec(struct task_struct *tsk) } return 0; } + +/* + * Were we in user mode when we were + * interrupted? + * + * Doing kernel_altivec/vsx_begin/end() is ok if we are running + * in an interrupt context from user mode - we'll just + * save the FPU state as required. + */ +static bool interrupted_user_mode(void) +{ + struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs(); + + return regs && user_mode(regs); +} + +/* + * Can we use SIMD in kernel mode with the + * whole "kernel_altivec/vsx_begin/end()" sequence? + * + * It's always ok in process context (ie "not interrupt") + * but it is sometimes ok even from an irq. + */ +bool irq_simd_usable(void) +{ + return !in_interrupt() || + interrupted_user_mode(); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(irq_simd_usable); + #else #define loadvec(thr) 0 static inline int restore_altivec(struct task_struct *tsk) { return 0; } -- 2.21.0.1020.gf2820cf01a