On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 04:28:36AM -0500, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote: > This patch implements few of the necessary hcalls for the nvdimm support. > > PAPR semantics is such that each NVDIMM device is comprising of multiple > SCM(Storage Class Memory) blocks. The guest requests the hypervisor to bind > each of the SCM blocks of the NVDIMM device using hcalls. There can be > SCM block unbind requests in case of driver errors or unplug(not supported now) > use cases. The NVDIMM label read/writes are done through hcalls. > > Since each virtual NVDIMM device is divided into multiple SCM blocks, the bind, > unbind, and queries using hcalls on those blocks can come independently. This > doesn't fit well into the qemu device semantics, where the map/unmap are done > at the (whole)device/object level granularity. The patch doesnt actually > bind/unbind on hcalls but let it happen at the object_add/del phase itself > instead. > > The guest kernel makes bind/unbind requests for the virtual NVDIMM device at the > region level granularity. Without interleaving, each virtual NVDIMM device is > presented as separate region. There is no way to configure the virtual NVDIMM > interleaving for the guests today. So, there is no way a partial bind/unbind > request can come for the vNVDIMM in a hcall for a subset of SCM blocks of a > virtual NVDIMM. Hence it is safe to do bind/unbind everything during the > object_add/del. > > Signed-off-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat > --- > hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 7 +- > 2 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c > index 6c16d2b120..b6e7d04dcf 100644 > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c > @@ -3,11 +3,13 @@ > #include "sysemu/hw_accel.h" > #include "sysemu/sysemu.h" > #include "qemu/log.h" > +#include "qemu/range.h" > #include "qemu/error-report.h" > #include "cpu.h" > #include "exec/exec-all.h" > #include "helper_regs.h" > #include "hw/ppc/spapr.h" > +#include "hw/ppc/spapr_drc.h" > #include "hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h" > #include "mmu-hash64.h" > #include "cpu-models.h" > @@ -16,6 +18,7 @@ > #include "hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h" > #include "mmu-book3s-v3.h" > #include "hw/mem/memory-device.h" > +#include "hw/mem/nvdimm.h" > > static bool has_spr(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int spr) > { > @@ -1795,6 +1798,199 @@ static target_ulong h_update_dt(PowerPCCPU *cpu, SpaprMachineState *spapr, > return H_SUCCESS; > } > > +static target_ulong h_scm_read_metadata(PowerPCCPU *cpu, > + SpaprMachineState *spapr, > + target_ulong opcode, > + target_ulong *args) > +{ > + uint32_t drc_index = args[0]; > + uint64_t offset = args[1]; > + uint64_t numBytesToRead = args[2]; > + SpaprDrc *drc = spapr_drc_by_index(drc_index); > + NVDIMMDevice *nvdimm = NULL; > + NVDIMMClass *ddc = NULL; > + > + if (drc && spapr_drc_type(drc) != SPAPR_DR_CONNECTOR_TYPE_PMEM) { > + return H_PARAMETER; > + } > + > + if (numBytesToRead != 1 && numBytesToRead != 2 && > + numBytesToRead != 4 && numBytesToRead != 8) { > + return H_P3; > + } > + > + nvdimm = NVDIMM(drc->dev); > + if ((offset + numBytesToRead < offset) || > + (nvdimm->label_size < numBytesToRead + offset)) { > + return H_P2; > + } > + > + ddc = NVDIMM_GET_CLASS(nvdimm); > + ddc->read_label_data(nvdimm, &args[0], numBytesToRead, offset); I'm pretty sure this will need some sort of byteswap. args[0] is effectively in host native order (since it maps to a register, not memory). But the guest will have to assume some byteorder (BE, I'm guessing, because PAPR) in order to map that register to an in-memory byteorder. So, you'll need to compensate for that here. > + return H_SUCCESS; > +} > + > + > +static target_ulong h_scm_write_metadata(PowerPCCPU *cpu, > + SpaprMachineState *spapr, > + target_ulong opcode, > + target_ulong *args) > +{ > + uint32_t drc_index = args[0]; > + uint64_t offset = args[1]; > + uint64_t data = args[2]; > + int8_t numBytesToWrite = args[3]; > + SpaprDrc *drc = spapr_drc_by_index(drc_index); > + NVDIMMDevice *nvdimm = NULL; > + DeviceState *dev = NULL; > + NVDIMMClass *ddc = NULL; > + > + if (drc && spapr_drc_type(drc) != SPAPR_DR_CONNECTOR_TYPE_PMEM) { > + return H_PARAMETER; > + } > + > + if (numBytesToWrite != 1 && numBytesToWrite != 2 && > + numBytesToWrite != 4 && numBytesToWrite != 8) { > + return H_P4; > + } > + > + dev = drc->dev; > + nvdimm = NVDIMM(dev); > + if ((nvdimm->label_size < numBytesToWrite + offset) || > + (offset + numBytesToWrite < offset)) { > + return H_P2; > + } > + > + ddc = NVDIMM_GET_CLASS(nvdimm); > + ddc->write_label_data(nvdimm, &data, numBytesToWrite, offset); Likewise here. > + > + return H_SUCCESS; > +} > + > +static target_ulong h_scm_bind_mem(PowerPCCPU *cpu, SpaprMachineState *spapr, > + target_ulong opcode, > + target_ulong *args) > +{ > + uint32_t drc_index = args[0]; > + uint64_t starting_idx = args[1]; > + uint64_t no_of_scm_blocks_to_bind = args[2]; > + uint64_t target_logical_mem_addr = args[3]; > + uint64_t continue_token = args[4]; > + uint64_t size; > + uint64_t total_no_of_scm_blocks; > + > + SpaprDrc *drc = spapr_drc_by_index(drc_index); > + hwaddr addr; > + DeviceState *dev = NULL; > + PCDIMMDevice *dimm = NULL; > + Error *local_err = NULL; > + > + if (drc && spapr_drc_type(drc) != SPAPR_DR_CONNECTOR_TYPE_PMEM) { > + return H_PARAMETER; > + } > + > + dev = drc->dev; > + dimm = PC_DIMM(dev); > + > + size = object_property_get_uint(OBJECT(dimm), > + PC_DIMM_SIZE_PROP, &local_err); > + if (local_err) { > + error_report_err(local_err); > + return H_PARAMETER; > + } > + > + total_no_of_scm_blocks = size / SPAPR_MINIMUM_SCM_BLOCK_SIZE; > + > + if ((starting_idx > total_no_of_scm_blocks) || > + (no_of_scm_blocks_to_bind > total_no_of_scm_blocks)) { > + return H_P2; > + } > + > + if (((starting_idx + no_of_scm_blocks_to_bind) < starting_idx) || > + ((starting_idx + no_of_scm_blocks_to_bind) > total_no_of_scm_blocks)) { > + return H_P3; > + } > + > + /* Currently qemu assigns the address. */ > + if (target_logical_mem_addr != 0xffffffffffffffff) { > + return H_OVERLAP; So, only supporting one mode of the interface is reasonable. However, it seems a somewhat unnatural way to handle the PAPR interface. It seems to me it would be more natural to instantiate the underlying NVDIMM objects so that they're not in address_space_memory, but rather in their own initially inaccssible address_space. Then the BIND call would alias a chunk of address_space_memory into the NVDIMMs address space. > + } > + > + /* > + * Currently continue token should be zero qemu has already bound > + * everything and this hcall doesnt return H_BUSY. > + */ > + if (continue_token > 0) { > + return H_P5; > + } > + > + /* NB : Already bound, Return target logical address in R4 */ > + addr = object_property_get_uint(OBJECT(dimm), > + PC_DIMM_ADDR_PROP, &local_err); > + if (local_err) { > + error_report_err(local_err); > + return H_PARAMETER; > + } > + > + args[1] = addr; Don't you need to adjust this if start_idx is non-zero? > + args[2] = no_of_scm_blocks_to_bind; > + > + return H_SUCCESS; > +} > + > +static target_ulong h_scm_unbind_mem(PowerPCCPU *cpu, SpaprMachineState *spapr, > + target_ulong opcode, > + target_ulong *args) > +{ > + uint32_t drc_index = args[0]; > + uint64_t starting_scm_logical_addr = args[1]; > + uint64_t no_of_scm_blocks_to_unbind = args[2]; > + uint64_t size_to_unbind; > + uint64_t continue_token = args[3]; > + Range blockrange = range_empty; > + Range nvdimmrange = range_empty; > + SpaprDrc *drc = spapr_drc_by_index(drc_index); > + DeviceState *dev = NULL; > + PCDIMMDevice *dimm = NULL; > + uint64_t size, addr; > + > + if (drc && spapr_drc_type(drc) != SPAPR_DR_CONNECTOR_TYPE_PMEM) { > + return H_PARAMETER; > + } > + > + /* Check if starting_scm_logical_addr is block aligned */ > + if (!QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(starting_scm_logical_addr, > + SPAPR_MINIMUM_SCM_BLOCK_SIZE)) { > + return H_P2; > + } > + > + dev = drc->dev; > + dimm = PC_DIMM(dev); > + size = object_property_get_int(OBJECT(dimm), PC_DIMM_SIZE_PROP, NULL); > + addr = object_property_get_int(OBJECT(dimm), PC_DIMM_ADDR_PROP, NULL); > + > + range_init_nofail(&nvdimmrange, addr, size); > + > + size_to_unbind = no_of_scm_blocks_to_unbind * SPAPR_MINIMUM_SCM_BLOCK_SIZE; > + > + > + range_init_nofail(&blockrange, starting_scm_logical_addr, size_to_unbind); > + > + if (!range_contains_range(&nvdimmrange, &blockrange)) { > + return H_P3; > + } > + > + if (continue_token > 0) { > + return H_P3; > + } > + > + args[1] = no_of_scm_blocks_to_unbind; > + > + /*NB : dont do anything, let object_del take care of this for now. */ > + return H_SUCCESS; > +} > + > static spapr_hcall_fn papr_hypercall_table[(MAX_HCALL_OPCODE / 4) + 1]; > static spapr_hcall_fn kvmppc_hypercall_table[KVMPPC_HCALL_MAX - KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 1]; > > @@ -1894,6 +2090,12 @@ static void hypercall_register_types(void) > /* qemu/KVM-PPC specific hcalls */ > spapr_register_hypercall(KVMPPC_H_RTAS, h_rtas); > > + /* qemu/scm specific hcalls */ > + spapr_register_hypercall(H_SCM_READ_METADATA, h_scm_read_metadata); > + spapr_register_hypercall(H_SCM_WRITE_METADATA, h_scm_write_metadata); > + spapr_register_hypercall(H_SCM_BIND_MEM, h_scm_bind_mem); > + spapr_register_hypercall(H_SCM_UNBIND_MEM, h_scm_unbind_mem); > + > /* ibm,client-architecture-support support */ > spapr_register_hypercall(KVMPPC_H_CAS, h_client_architecture_support); > > diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h > index 394ea26335..48e2cc9d67 100644 > --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h > +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h > @@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ struct SpaprMachineState { > #define H_P7 -60 > #define H_P8 -61 > #define H_P9 -62 > +#define H_OVERLAP -68 > #define H_UNSUPPORTED_FLAG -256 > #define H_MULTI_THREADS_ACTIVE -9005 > > @@ -490,8 +491,12 @@ struct SpaprMachineState { > #define H_INT_ESB 0x3C8 > #define H_INT_SYNC 0x3CC > #define H_INT_RESET 0x3D0 > +#define H_SCM_READ_METADATA 0x3E4 > +#define H_SCM_WRITE_METADATA 0x3E8 > +#define H_SCM_BIND_MEM 0x3EC > +#define H_SCM_UNBIND_MEM 0x3F0 > > -#define MAX_HCALL_OPCODE H_INT_RESET > +#define MAX_HCALL_OPCODE H_SCM_UNBIND_MEM > > /* The hcalls above are standardized in PAPR and implemented by pHyp > * as well. > -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson