All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Olivier Chapelliere <olivier.chapelliere@alcmeon.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stuck in inotify_release
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 11:25:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190514092519.GA20782@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANp+0hhdCeP4R=MJFkk2z=v5Q5z1K0gjVCWRz_T6mwzsYtx36g@mail.gmail.com>

Hello!

On Mon 06-05-19 20:54:24, Olivier Chapelliere wrote:
> It finally took a month to happen again : python processes watching a
> directory are stuck in inotify_release.
> I ran the sysrq commands as you requested and attached the result.

Thanks. I was looking into these traces but the situation is the same as
before. Everyone is blocked waiting for inotify group to shut down. That is
blocked waiting for worker to finish destroying notification marks and the
worker is blocked in synchronize_srcu() waiting for SRCU grace period to
end. Now I didn't find any process that would be holding the SRCU lock so
it seems that someone exited the SRCU locked section without releasing the
lock. I've checked 4.15 your Ubuntu kernel is based on and I don't see how
that would be possible. It it possible though, that the problem is
introduced by some Ubuntu specific backports. Would it be possible for you
to run some vanilla kernel (i.e., without Ubuntu modifications)?

								Honza

> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:52 AM Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu 28-03-19 09:26:45, Olivier Chapelliere wrote:
> > > According to what I read on internet you seem to be the right person to get
> > > in touch with when one has problems with inotify.
> >
> > Yes, there's also linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org mailing list which we use
> > (added to CC).
> >
> > > We are monitoring several directories in python processes through inotify.
> > > But after few days all processes are stuck in a call to inotify_release.
> > > Once I detected the problem, I dumped info to dmesg with sysrq-trigger
> > > (dmesg content attached):
> > > echo w > /proc/sysrq-trigger
> >
> > Looking through the stack traces, all of them wait in fput() ->
> > inotify_release() -> ... -> fsnotify_wait_marks_destroyed() ->
> > flush_delayed_work(&reaper_work). So they wait for worker process to
> > destroy all marks for the group. However that worker (kworker/u8:4) is
> > stuck in:
> >
> > fsnotify_mark_destroy_workfn() -> synchronize_srcu(&fsnotify_mark_srcu)
> >
> > So the question is who is holding fsnotify_mark_srcu so that SRCU cannot
> > declare new grace period. I don't see any such process among the processes
> > you've shown in the dump (but it should be there) so it's a bit of a
> > mystery.
> >
> > > Our production env is ubuntu 18.04 kernel 4.15 fs ext4
> > > This problem appears on a weekly basis so I will be able to run additional
> > > commands to track down the issue if needed.
> >
> > So when this happens again, try grabbing output of sysrq-l and sysrq-t if
> > we can find the task holding fsnotify_mark_srcu.
> >
> >                                                                 Honza
> > --
> > Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
> > SUSE Labs, CR
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Olivier Chapelliere


-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-14  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CANp+0hhbsegocrx-MK0DS=Qx4DfivB27nSKHrukiFAY6x6cJQA@mail.gmail.com>
2019-03-28  9:52 ` stuck in inotify_release Jan Kara
2019-05-06 18:54   ` Olivier Chapelliere
2019-05-14  6:22     ` Olivier Chapelliere
2019-05-14  9:25     ` Jan Kara [this message]
     [not found]       ` <CANp+0hiZt=oEWMUqRC-pv9=8JnvSyPcpDCf+O5whth1C_q0jNA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]         ` <CAC8Mkjy=igiQatSVXNXphjyzGn2faZ75XZZGANWOtt3hvwk8DA@mail.gmail.com>
2019-05-14 15:44           ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190514092519.GA20782@quack2.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olivier.chapelliere@alcmeon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.