Hi Annaliese,

On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:37:03PM -0700, Annaliese McDermond wrote:
> I’m just following up on this since I haven’t heard anything since I submitted the
> v2 patch a week ago.  Wolfram, does this look like a sane approach?  Stefan,
> were my changes in v2 acceptable?

There is a bit of overhead involved, but conceptually it looks like an
elegant solution to me. However, I am not an expert of CCF. Grepping
through kernel sources, I don't see many clocks defined outside
drivers/clk. So, I'd appreciate if we could get some ack/feedback from
one of the CCF experts/maintainers.

> I’m happy to go back to the drawing board to change things if there’s a better
> answer to the problem.
> 
> Thanks for everyone’s patience with me trying to work through the proper
> process.

Thanks for working on this one!

Kind regards,

   Wolfram