On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 05:23:52PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote:
> Allwinner H6 has a similar watchdog as the A64 which is already
> a compatible of the A31.
>
> This commit sort the lines and add the H6 compatible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sunxi-wdt.txt         | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sunxi-wdt.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sunxi-wdt.txt
> index 46055254e8dd..f4810f8ad1c5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sunxi-wdt.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/sunxi-wdt.txt
> @@ -3,10 +3,12 @@ Allwinner SoCs Watchdog timer
>  Required properties:
>
>  - compatible : should be one of
> -	"allwinner,sun4i-a10-wdt"
> -	"allwinner,sun6i-a31-wdt"
> -	"allwinner,sun50i-a64-wdt","allwinner,sun6i-a31-wdt"
> -	"allwinner,suniv-f1c100s-wdt", "allwinner,sun4i-a10-wdt"

That sorting was kind of intentional

> +	- "allwinner,sun4i-a10-wdt"
> +	- "allwinner,sun50i-a64-wdt","allwinner,sun6i-a31-wdt"
> +	- "allwinner,sun50i-h6-wdt","allwinner,sun50i-a64-wdt",
> +	  "allwinner,sun6i-a31-wdt"

Is there a reason to keep the A64 compatible?

Thanks,
Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com