From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([85.220.165.71]:33385 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727464AbfEVK5m (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2019 06:57:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 12:57:39 +0200 From: Marco Felsch Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] Add Support for Kontron SMARC-sAMX6i Message-ID: <20190522105739.tp2mlxel2w7tdvv7@pengutronix.de> References: <20190509155834.22838-1-m.felsch@pengutronix.de> <20190520021639.GG15856@dragon> <20190521082903.xsc643uvgqjg5ue7@pengutronix.de> <20190521091110.GG15856@dragon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190521091110.GG15856@dragon> Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Shawn Guo Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Gilles.Buloz@kontron.com, Michael.Brunner@kontron.com, frieder.schrempf@kontron.de, thomas.schaefer@kontron.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, Stefan.Nickl@kontron.com, linux-imx@nxp.com, kernel@pengutronix.de List-ID: On 19-05-21 17:11, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:29:03AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote: > > Hi Shawn, > > > > On 19-05-20 10:16, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 05:58:17PM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > this series adds the Kontron SoM 'SMARC-sAMX6i' which is compatible to > > > > the SMARC 1.1 standard [1]. Most of the muxing can be done within the > > > > SoM dtsi since the standard defines a unique SoM hardware interface. > > > > > > > > This series is based on Priit Laes initial commit [2] which adds the > > > > initial support. I addressed the comments and changed the copyright > > > > since there where a lot of fixes. > > > > > > > > Testers are welcome :) since I used a custome baseboard which doesn't > > > > use all of the interfaces. > > > > > > > > [1] https://sget.org/standards/smarc > > > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/762261/ > > > > > > > > Marco Felsch (14): > > > > dt-bindings: add Kontron vendor prefix > > > > ARCH: arm: dts: imx6qdl-kontron-samx6i: add SMARC SDIO interface > > > > ARCH: arm: dts: imx6qdl-kontron-samx6i: add SMARC LCD interface > > > > ARCH: arm: dts: imx6qdl-kontron-samx6i: add SMARC Management pins > > > > ARCH: arm: dts: imx6qdl-kontron-samx6i: add SMARC GPIO interface > > > > ARCH: arm: dts: imx6qdl-kontron-samx6i: add SMARC HDMI interface > > > > ARCH: arm: dts: imx6qdl-kontron-samx6i: add SMARC CSI Camera interface > > > > ARCH: arm: dts: imx6qdl-kontron-samx6i: add SMARC I2S interface > > > > ARCH: arm: dts: imx6qdl-kontron-samx6i: add SMARC SPI1 interface > > > > ARCH: arm: dts: imx6qdl-kontron-samx6i: add SMARC Watchdog > > > > ARCH: arm: dts: imx6qdl-kontron-samx6i: add SMARC module eeprom > > > > ARCH: arm: dts: imx6qdl-kontron-samx6i: add power management support > > > > ARCH: arm: dts: imx6q-kontron-samx6i: add Kontron SMARC Quad/Dual SoM > > > > ARCH: arm: dts: imx6dl-kontron-samx6i: add Kontron SMARC > > > > Dual-Lite/Solo SoM > > > > > > > > Michael Grzeschik (2): > > > > ARCH: arm: dts: imx6qdl-kontron-samx6i: add SMARC SPI0 interface > > > > ARCH: arm: dts: imx6qdl-kontron-samx6i: add boot spi-nor > > > > > > > > Priit Laes (1): > > > > ARCH: arm: dts: imx6qdl-kontron-samx6i: Add iMX6-based Kontron > > > > SMARC-sAMX6i module > > > > > > Do we really need so many patches for adding a single board support, or > > > can we squash some of them? > > > > I wanted to keep them logical ordered but I can squash them if you want. > > Please squash, thanks. Okay, last question. Should I keep Priit Laes patch seperate and add one patch above or should I squash all of them? Regards, Marco > > Shawn >