On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 05:16:06PM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On 5/21/2019 12:50 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > > +static int spmi_regulator_common_list_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> > > +					      unsigned selector);
> > > +
> > > +static int spmi_regulator_common2_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> > > +					      unsigned selector)

> > Eeew, can we not have better names?

> I'm open to suggestions.  Apparently there are two register common register
> schemes - the old one and the new one.  PMIC designs after some random point
> in time are all the new register scheme per the documentation I see.

> As far as I an aware, the FT426 design is the first design to be added to
> this driver to make use of the new scheme, but I expect more to be supported
> in future, thus I'm reluctant to make these ft426 specific in the name.

If there's a completely new register map why are these even in the same
driver?

> > > +	if (reg == SPMI_COMMON2_MODE_HPM_MASK)
> > > +		return REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL;
> > > +
> > > +	if (reg == SPMI_COMMON2_MODE_AUTO_MASK)
> > > +		return REGULATOR_MODE_FAST;
> > > +
> > > +	return REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE;
> > > +}

> > This looks like you want to write a switch statement.

> It follows the existing style in the driver, but sure I can make this a
> switch.

Please fix the rest of the driver as well then.