From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <guilhem@fripost.org>
Received: from outgoing.fripost.org (giraff.fripost.org [193.234.15.44])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.server123.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
 for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Wed, 22 May 2019 19:23:58 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 19:16:15 +0200
From: Guilhem Moulin <guilhem@fripost.org>
Message-ID: <20190522171614.GA23632@fripost.org>
References: <CAF9Mo3JjqorX2q+-FneK9CKdYkaSHUSuiNwG=ywZnCXK8fX9SA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190522124652.GA1205@tansi.org>
 <CAF9Mo3JhQ1AQ5-0a4o_EYou5mOGzW1VZEOC7mYqmVVUMGBiqcQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAF9Mo3JhQ1AQ5-0a4o_EYou5mOGzW1VZEOC7mYqmVVUMGBiqcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] LUKS + dm-crypt Debian/Ubuntu expanding encrypted
 root LV onto 2nd disk
List-Id: <dm-crypt.saout.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.saout.de/mailman/options/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.saout.de/pipermail/dm-crypt/>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-crypt@saout.de>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=subscribe>
To: Dominic Raferd <dominic@timedicer.co.uk>
Cc: dm-crypt@saout.de


--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Dominic,

On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 13:53:07 +0100, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> Thanks Arno, I think it is Debian really (rather than Ubuntu), but I
> couldn't see where to ask except here. Will dig some more.

For Debian you could file a bug against the =E2=80=98cryptsetup-initramfs=
=E2=80=99
package, see https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/cryptsetup and
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ .

(=E2=80=98Severity: wishlist=E2=80=99 I guess; at least your custom patch n=
ot applying
anymore isn't hinting at a regression.)

Also FWIW we (Debian packaging team) have native support for unlocking
multiple devices at early boot stage with a single passphrase prompt,
see /usr/share/doc/cryptsetup-initramfs/README.initramfs.gz and
/usr/share/doc/cryptsetup-run/README.* .  If that doesn't cover your
workflow then please visit the above links and file a wishlist bug :-)

Cheers,
--=20
Guilhem.

--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=yuM9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga--