Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix the interpretation of MAX_PRE-EMPHASIS_REACHED bit inorder to pass Link Layer compliance test number 400.3.1.15

[Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>]

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 04:24:58PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 04:25:41PM -0700, Khaled Almahallawy wrote:
> > According to DP 1.4 standard, if the source supports four pre-emphasis levels, then the source shall set the bit MAX_PRE-EMPHASIS_REACHED = 1 only when trasmitter programmed PRE-EMPHASIS_SET field (bits 4:3) to 11b (Level 3). Pre-emphasis level 3 is the maximum pre-emphasis level that the source supports.
> > Currently the MAX_PRE-EMPHASIS_REACHED bit is interpreted as the Max Pre-Emphasis level for certain Swing Level. This interpretation fails Link Layer compliance test 400.3.1.15 step 17 according to the following Fail condition: TRAINING_LANEx_SET.MAX_PRE-EMPHASIS_REACHED = 1 (check all active lanes) and the Source DUT supports pre-emphasis level 3 (9.5db).
> 
> Hmm. I guess that's correct. The spec doesn't say anything about
> per-vswing pre-emphasis when talking about the 'max reached' bit.
> 
> > 
> > Cc: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
> > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Khaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 20 --------------------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c  |  2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > index 0af47f343faa..6540c979c098 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > @@ -2239,26 +2239,6 @@ u8 intel_ddi_dp_voltage_max(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> >  		DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_MASK;
> >  }
> >  
> > -/*
> > - * We assume that the full set of pre-emphasis values can be
> > - * used on all DDI platforms. Should that change we need to
> > - * rethink this code.
> > - */
> > -u8 intel_ddi_dp_pre_emphasis_max(struct intel_encoder *encoder, u8 voltage_swing)
> > -{
> > -	switch (voltage_swing & DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_MASK) {
> > -	case DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_0:
> > -		return DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_3;
> > -	case DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_1:
> > -		return DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_2;
> > -	case DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_2:
> > -		return DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_1;
> > -	case DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_3:
> > -	default:
> > -		return DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_0;
> > -	}
> > -}
> > -
> >  static void cnl_ddi_vswing_program(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> >  				   int level, enum intel_output_type type)
> >  {
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > index 77ba4da6b981..f94759e45862 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -3541,7 +3541,7 @@ intel_dp_pre_emphasis_max(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 voltage_swing)
> >  	enum port port = encoder->port;
> >  
> >  	if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
> > -		return intel_ddi_dp_pre_emphasis_max(encoder, voltage_swing);
> > +		return DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_3;
> 
> We're going to have to change this for all platforms.
> 
> Also we need to update the code to pick the correct swing/pre-emphasis
> when we can't do what is being requested.

This check will need to be added in adjust_train() function

> 
> The spec says:
> "When the combination of the requested pre-emphasis level and voltage
>  swing exceeds the capability of a DPTX, the DPTX shall set the pre-emphasis
>  level according to the request and use the highest voltage swing it can
>  output with the given pre-emphasis level."
> and
> "When a DPTX reads a request beyond the limits of this Standard, the
>  DPTX shall set the pre-emphasis level according to the request and set
>  the highest voltage swing level it can output with the given pre-emphasis
>  level. If a DPTX is requested for 9.5dB of pre-emphasis level (may be 
>  supported for a DPTX) and cannot support that level, it shall set the
>  pre-emphasis level to the next highest level, 6dB."

So my interpretation of this is :

In adjust_train() function:

vswing_max = intel_dp_voltage_max() which is set per platform
pre_emphasis_max = set to level 3 
 
v = get_requested_voltage_swing() - Limit this to vmax
p = get_requested_pre_emphasis() - Limit this to pmax

Now rewrite the intel_ddi_dp_pre_emphasis_max() function to call it intel_ddi_dp_possible_vswing_max()
where we set the possible vswing max based on requested pre emphasis and table in the bspec
Eg: if requested pre emphasis is 3, the vswing is 0 which is the max vswing value
it can ouput with that pre emphasis level based on the bspec vswing programming values

Set v = that value
p = requested

Link train

Ville, is this logic correct? 

Regards
Manasi


> 
> 
> 
> >  	} else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
> >  		switch (voltage_swing & DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_MASK) {
> >  		case DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_0:
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx