From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/mlx5: Use DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL macro to allow 32 bit to build Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 08:48:12 -0400 Message-ID: <20190523084812.325454f6@gandalf.local.home> References: <20190522145450.25ff483d@gandalf.local.home> <20190523065803.GB30439@unicorn.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190523065803.GB30439@unicorn.suse.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Michal Kubecek Cc: LKML , Leon Romanovsky , Doug Ledford , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 23 May 2019 08:58:03 +0200 Michal Kubecek wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c > > index abac70ad5c7c..40d4c5f7ea43 100644 > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c > > @@ -2344,7 +2344,7 @@ static int handle_alloc_dm_sw_icm(struct ib_ucontext *ctx, > > /* Allocation size must a multiple of the basic block size > > * and a power of 2. > > */ > > - act_size = roundup(attr->length, MLX5_SW_ICM_BLOCK_SIZE(dm_db->dev)); > > + act_size = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(attr->length, MLX5_SW_ICM_BLOCK_SIZE(dm_db->dev)); > > act_size = roundup_pow_of_two(act_size); > > > > dm->size = act_size; > > This seems wrong: roundup() rounds up to a multiple of second argument > but DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL() would divide with rounding up. Yeah, the macros are a bit confusing. There's unfortunately no roundup_64() (perhaps we should make one?) #define roundup(x, y) ( \ { \ typeof(y) __y = y; \ (((x) + (__y - 1)) / __y) * __y; \ } \ ) #define DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL(ll, d) \ ({ unsigned long long _tmp = (ll); do_div(_tmp, d); _tmp; }) #define DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(ll, d) DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL((ll) + (d) - 1, (d)) roundup(a, b) == ((a + b - 1) / b) * b DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(a, b) DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL(a + b - 1, b) = (a + b - 1) / b Hmm, looks like you are right (damn, I thought I did this before posting the patch, but I must have miscalculated something). It does look like we are missing a "* b" in there. I think I'll go and just add a roundup_64()! Thanks for pointing this out. -- Steve