From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Sakamoto Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ALSA: firewire-lib: unify handlers for incoming packet Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 15:37:16 +0900 Message-ID: <20190524063716.GA25133@workstation> References: <20190522141708.29159-1-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34E8DF80C0F for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 08:37:24 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" To: Takashi Iwai Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, clemens@ladisch.de List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 08:04:06AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > I already applied the previous patchset that had been submitted on > > Tuesday, and this seems conflicting. > > Sorry, I replied to the wrong thread. I meant the new one > <20190523151440.5127-1-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> > conflicting with the current for-next branch. It's the latest one: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 0/4] ALSA: firewire-lib: unify handlers for outgoing packet https://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2019-May/149708.html I'll check them and resubmit after rebasing to current for-next. Thanks Takashi Sakamoto