On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:23:54PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 03:29:11PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > spapr_populate_pci_child_dt() adds a 'name' property to the device tree
> > node for PCI devices.  This is never necessary for a flattened device tree,
> > it is implicit in the name added when the node is constructed.  In fact
> > anything we do add to a 'name' property will be overwritten with something
> > derived from the structural name in the guest firmware (but in fact it is
> > exactly the same bytes).
> > 
> > So, remove that.  In addition, pci_get_node_name() is very simple, so fold
> > it into its (also simple) sole caller spapr_create_pci_child_dt().
> > 
> > While we're there rename pci_find_device_name() to the shorter and more
> > accurate dt_name_from_class().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> 
> The threading is broken here btw.

I'm not entirely sure what you mean by that.  I did forget to add a
cover letter.

> I was CC'd but it's mostly PPC stuff.

Yeah, this was just for reference, since it is PCI stuff for ppc.

> I like how pci_XX functions that are not in pci.c are
> going away :)

You're welcome.

> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Thanks.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson