From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=CtY/=UD=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E2DC282CE
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue,  4 Jun 2019 12:02:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D67248A3
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue,  4 Jun 2019 12:02:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727513AbfFDMCB (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:02:01 -0400
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59402 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1727250AbfFDMCB (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:02:01 -0400
Received: from oasis.local.home (unknown [146.247.46.6])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C76CB2489A;
        Tue,  4 Jun 2019 12:01:57 +0000 (UTC)
Date:   Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:01:53 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc:     Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, williams@redhat.com,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
        Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>,
        Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] softirq: Use preempt_latency_stop/start to trace
 preemption
Message-ID: <20190604080153.554a9ffd@oasis.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <835664be-a8ef-d164-4bf9-e0918413796c@redhat.com>
References: <cover.1559051152.git.bristot@redhat.com>
        <b6bb4705efb0c01c11008ae3c46bc74555245303.1559051152.git.bristot@redhat.com>
        <20190529093056.GA146079@google.com>
        <20190529082248.76bb7a6c@oasis.local.home>
        <835664be-a8ef-d164-4bf9-e0918413796c@redhat.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 12:39:03 +0200
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> wrote:

> > This sounds more like a break in behavior not a functional change. I
> > guess moving it to a header and making it a static __always_inline
> > should be fine though.  
> 
> Steve, which header should I use?

I would say include/linux/preempt.h if Peter doesn't have any issues
with that.

-- Steve