From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E019CC28CC3 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 20:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C356A20848 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 20:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726711AbfFDUgv (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 16:36:51 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:44647 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726033AbfFDUgu (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 16:36:50 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Jun 2019 13:36:50 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from sjchrist-coffee.jf.intel.com (HELO linux.intel.com) ([10.54.74.36]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2019 13:36:49 -0700 Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:36:49 -0700 From: Sean Christopherson To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen , Cedric Xing , Stephen Smalley , James Morris , "Serge E . Hallyn" , LSM List , Paul Moore , Eric Paris , selinux@vger.kernel.org, Jethro Beekman , Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , LKML , X86 ML , linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, Serge Ayoun , Shay Katz-zamir , Haitao Huang , Andy Shevchenko , Kai Svahn , Borislav Petkov , Josh Triplett , Kai Huang , David Rientjes , William Roberts , Philip Tricca Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 8/9] LSM: x86/sgx: Introduce ->enclave_load() hook for Intel SGX Message-ID: <20190604203649.GC7775@linux.intel.com> References: <20190531233159.30992-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <20190531233159.30992-9-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 01:29:10PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 4:32 PM Sean Christopherson > wrote: > > static int sgx_encl_add_page(struct sgx_encl *encl, unsigned long addr, > > diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h > > index 47f58cfb6a19..0562775424a0 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h > > +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h > > @@ -1446,6 +1446,14 @@ > > * @bpf_prog_free_security: > > * Clean up the security information stored inside bpf prog. > > * > > + * Security hooks for Intel SGX enclaves. > > + * > > + * @enclave_load: > > + * On success, returns 0 and optionally adjusts @allowed_prot > > + * @vma: the source memory region of the enclave page being loaded. > > + * @prot: the initial protection of the enclave page. > > What do you mean "initial"? The page is always mapped PROT_NONE when > this is called, right? I feel like I must be missing something here. Initial protection in the EPCM. Yet another reason to ignore SECINFO.