All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: "Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Cc: "Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] docker: update fedora to f30
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 16:10:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190605151008.GE8956@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMxuvay+ZrdjhJg-juU0aTOtcy=cLshC+WGyPBQ6VysXZksa5w@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 01:17:17PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:41 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/24/19 1:40 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > Released last month.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker b/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker
> > > index 69d4a7f5d7..1496b68ba1 100644
> > > --- a/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker
> > > +++ b/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker
> > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > > -FROM fedora:29
> > > +FROM fedora:30
> >
> > Hmm this patch is pending for review:
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg00819.html
> 
> Oh I missed that. Maybe we should use "latest" to avoid bumping the
> version every 6 months.
> 
> fwiw we have different versions:
> 
> tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora-cris-cross.docker:FROM fedora:latest
> tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora-i386-cross.docker:FROM fedora:29
> tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker:FROM fedora:29
> 
> In 62559b916 "tests: update Fedora i386 cross image to Fedora 29", Daniel said:
> 
>     Using the "latest" tag is not a good idea because this changes what
>     release it points to every 6 months. Together with caching of docker
>     builds this can cause confusion where CI has cached & built with Fedora
>     N, while a developer tries to reproduce a CI problem with Fedora N + 1,
>     or vica-verca.
> 
> But at the same time, Daniel bumped f28 to f29 in commit 19a9978db1.
> 
> It's confusing, do we need some stability or follow the latest?

The problem is introduced by local caching. "latest" may point to "29"
today, but the CI system had cached content meaining its use of "latest"
still resolved to "28".

Using "29" meant both CI & developers saw the same image, even when
caching is used.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-05 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-23 23:40 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] tests/docker: add podman support Marc-André Lureau
2019-05-23 23:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] docker.py: " Marc-André Lureau
2019-05-23 23:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] tests/docker: " Marc-André Lureau
2019-05-23 23:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] docker: update fedora to f30 Marc-André Lureau
2019-05-24  7:41   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-24 11:17     ` Marc-André Lureau
2019-05-28 15:31       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-30  9:51       ` Alex Bennée
2019-06-05 15:10       ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2019-06-05 15:39         ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-23 23:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] qemu-sockets: do not require configured ipv4/ipv6 address Marc-André Lureau
2019-06-05 15:06   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-24  4:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] tests/docker: add podman support Gerd Hoffmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190605151008.GE8956@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.