From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3E4C28CC5 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 18:07:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED95020872 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 18:07:20 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ED95020872 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48029 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYaJj-0006Vz-QZ for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 14:07:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39393) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYaIt-0006Cv-N3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 14:06:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYaIo-0004ZU-Lw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 14:06:23 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55406) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYaIo-0004Rn-FS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 14:06:22 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 219E67EBDC for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 18:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-116-9.gru2.redhat.com [10.97.116.9]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFD9101E698; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 18:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 15:06:08 -0300 From: Eduardo Habkost To: Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=2E_Berrang=E9?= Message-ID: <20190605180608.GW22416@habkost.net> References: <1559205199-233510-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <20190605173311.GA13261@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190605173311.GA13261@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Wed, 05 Jun 2019 18:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] numa: deprecate '-numa node, mem' and default memory distribution X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, Igor Mammedov , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 06:33:11PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrang=E9 wrote: [...] > I wonder if there's a way to close the testing gap somehow ? Random ide= a > would be a non-versioned "pc-no-deprecated" machine type, which blocks > all use of deprecated features and does not promise any migration compa= t. > Essentially it would exist just for testing purposem as a way todo > functional tests for libvirt & mgmt apps to prove they don't use any > deprecated features (any deprecated features, not merely this NUMA one= ). This isn't the first time I wish we had a machine type with experimental features enabled. What about calling it "pc-next"? --=20 Eduardo