From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:59632 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725950AbfFETPX (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2019 15:15:23 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: [PATCH 03/24] xfs: renumber XBF_WRITE_FAIL Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 21:14:50 +0200 Message-Id: <20190605191511.32695-4-hch@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20190605191511.32695-1-hch@lst.de> References: <20190605191511.32695-1-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: Dave Chinner Assining a numerical value that is not close to the flags defined near by is just asking for conflicts later on. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner --- fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h index 4f2c2bc43003..15f6ce3974ac 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ typedef enum { #define XBF_ASYNC (1 << 4) /* initiator will not wait for completion */ #define XBF_DONE (1 << 5) /* all pages in the buffer uptodate */ #define XBF_STALE (1 << 6) /* buffer has been staled, do not find it */ -#define XBF_WRITE_FAIL (1 << 24)/* async writes have failed on this buffer */ +#define XBF_WRITE_FAIL (1 << 7) /* async writes have failed on this buffer */ /* I/O hints for the BIO layer */ #define XBF_SYNCIO (1 << 10)/* treat this buffer as synchronous I/O */ -- 2.20.1