From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid0: Do not bypass blocking queue entered for raid0 bios Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 20:36:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20190612183659.GA16699@kroah.com> References: <20190523172345.1861077-1-songliubraving@fb.com> <20190523172345.1861077-2-songliubraving@fb.com> <3d77dc37-e4be-2395-7067-5a9b6a71bf3a@canonical.com> <20190612164958.GB31124@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Guilherme Piccoli Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu , linux-raid , Jens Axboe , Ming Lei , Song Liu , Tetsuo Handa , sashal@kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 03:07:11PM -0300, Guilherme Piccoli wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 1:50 PM Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:37:24PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: > > > +Greg, Sasha > > > > Please resend them in a format that they can be applied in. > > > > Also, I need a TON of descriptions about why this differs from what is > > in Linus's tree, as it is, what you have below does not show that at > > all, they seem to be valud for 5.2-rc1. > > Thanks Greg, I'll work on it. Can this "ton" of description be a cover-letter? Nope, in the commit log itself as we need it in the tree if we apply it. Remember, 99% of all patches that we take in the stable tree that are NOT in Linus's tree end up having bugs. Yours will, and we want lots of documentation about exactly why we are thinking we are justified in taking this patch :) thanks, greg k-h