From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E949C31E45 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0729121721 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:40:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1560444001; bh=TSrEDnX7Ga+OT/0BXEKx34O47oo4LLPfMWp6E0aFb3U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=L8czdBvBa+l1pDmfFbKjFz5C+4m5hJulIXV3VXXjFWcOGhrDnoUyq/E1Qu5fYbbvZ HnM+T4vKD3RsaEGScIVYvPdK0qhtXunryVnqZUcqwnzAvi/VK38pdQ9dzSgXkoSH7y w1X6TheMM22tXlWt5uW6gYDZX9hxuZaVRa0GDPeY= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730669AbfFMQkA (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:40:00 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42038 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730589AbfFMHJC (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 03:09:02 -0400 Received: from devnote2 (NE2965lan1.rev.em-net.ne.jp [210.141.244.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC3192084D; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 07:08:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1560409741; bh=TSrEDnX7Ga+OT/0BXEKx34O47oo4LLPfMWp6E0aFb3U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OJXhLljb1L/cW2VX/Ik35Ba7g2+83Db325bkvBGIZQ2eR9wJHabo6wF2PTU/NsKh+ ZtrhhtVTSv8f2pR1zJWNPdAr2syS+UAQ2RZnJt/E3Ucgo3njwDgZcig/7ASmgg+bOF A3cFXOFkxxKxolFbE1pEHSk1ThdbsG1FmoUKvL0Y= Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:08:57 +0900 From: Masami Hiramatsu To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Anders Roxell , Ingo Molnar , "Naveen N . Rao" , Anil S Keshavamurthy , "David S . Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Fix to init kprobes in subsys_initcall Message-Id: <20190613160857.9db38d1cb32996b8c4e0ddc3@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20190612094729.40106a28@gandalf.local.home> References: <20190603214105.715a4072472ef4946123dc20@kernel.org> <155956708268.12228.10363800793132214198.stgit@devnote2> <20190612165947.ba696696dac0faa3aa35a501@kernel.org> <20190612094729.40106a28@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 09:47:29 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:59:47 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > Hi Steve, > > > > Could you pick this to your ftrace/core branch? > > "core" or should this go to "urgent"? The difference is that core is > scheduled for the next merge window, and urgent is for the rc releases > (ie. bug fixes). If the previous one (b5f8b32c93b2) has already gone to rc, yes this should be in urgent, since this always crashes arm64 kernel if we enables CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST. Thank you, -- Masami Hiramatsu