From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160C0C31E45 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED17C2147A for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:26:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726525AbfFMT0B (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:26:01 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:51486 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725809AbfFMT0A (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:26:00 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5DJLZje048938; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:25:55 -0400 Received: from ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (fd.55.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.85.253]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2t3td35mj0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:25:54 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5DJKhro018394; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:25:55 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.25]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2t1qctuepp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:25:55 +0000 Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.110]) by b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x5DJPrq422741370 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:25:53 GMT Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15547AE05C; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:25:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB725AE062; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:25:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [9.18.239.78]) by b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:25:52 +0000 (GMT) From: "Mauro S. M. Rodrigues" To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: aelior@marvell.com, skalluru@marvell.com, GR-everest-linux-l2@marvell.com, davem@davemloft.net, maurosr@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH net] bnx2x: Check if transceiver implements DDM before access Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:25:40 -0300 Message-Id: <20190613192540.15645-1-maurosr@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-13_12:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906130143 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Some transceivers may comply with SFF-8472 even though they do not implement the Digital Diagnostic Monitoring (DDM) interface described in the spec. The existence of such area is specified by the 6th bit of byte 92, set to 1 if implemented. Currently, without checking this bit, bnx2x fails trying to read sfp module's EEPROM with the follow message: ethtool -m enP5p1s0f1 Cannot get Module EEPROM data: Input/output error Because it fails to read the additional 256 bytes in which it is assumed to exist the DDM data. This issue was noticed using a Mellanox Passive DAC PN 01FT738. The EEPROM data was confirmed by Mellanox as correct and similar to other Passive DACs from other manufacturers. Signed-off-by: Mauro S. M. Rodrigues --- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_ethtool.c | 3 ++- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_link.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_ethtool.c index 0745cccd416d..51fc845de31a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_ethtool.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_ethtool.c @@ -1609,7 +1609,8 @@ static int bnx2x_get_module_info(struct net_device *dev, } if (!sff8472_comp || - (diag_type & SFP_EEPROM_DIAG_ADDR_CHANGE_REQ)) { + (diag_type & SFP_EEPROM_DIAG_ADDR_CHANGE_REQ) || + !(diag_type & SFP_EEPROM_DDM_IMPLEMENTED)) { modinfo->type = ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079; modinfo->eeprom_len = ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079_LEN; } else { diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_link.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_link.h index b7d251108c19..7115f5025664 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_link.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_link.h @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ #define SFP_EEPROM_DIAG_TYPE_ADDR 0x5c #define SFP_EEPROM_DIAG_TYPE_SIZE 1 #define SFP_EEPROM_DIAG_ADDR_CHANGE_REQ (1<<2) +#define SFP_EEPROM_DDM_IMPLEMENTED (1<<6) #define SFP_EEPROM_SFF_8472_COMP_ADDR 0x5e #define SFP_EEPROM_SFF_8472_COMP_SIZE 1 -- 2.21.0