All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>,
	Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG]: mm/vmalloc: uninitialized variable access in pcpu_get_vm_areas
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 16:12:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190617141244.5x22nrylw7hodafp@pc636> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190617121427.77565-1-arnd@arndb.de>

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 02:14:11PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc points out some obviously broken code in linux-next
> 
> mm/vmalloc.c: In function 'pcpu_get_vm_areas':
> mm/vmalloc.c:991:4: error: 'lva' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>     insert_vmap_area_augment(lva, &va->rb_node,
>     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>      &free_vmap_area_root, &free_vmap_area_list);
>      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> mm/vmalloc.c:916:20: note: 'lva' was declared here
>   struct vmap_area *lva;
>                     ^~~
> 
> Remove the obviously broken code. This is almost certainly
> not the correct solution, but it's what I have applied locally
> to get a clean build again.
> 
> Please fix this properly.
> 
> Fixes: 68ad4a330433 ("mm/vmalloc.c: keep track of free blocks for vmap allocation")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c | 7 +------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index a9213fc3802d..bfcf0124a773 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -984,14 +984,9 @@ adjust_va_to_fit_type(struct vmap_area *va,
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (type != FL_FIT_TYPE) {
> +	if (type == FL_FIT_TYPE)
>  		augment_tree_propagate_from(va);
>  
> -		if (type == NE_FIT_TYPE)
> -			insert_vmap_area_augment(lva, &va->rb_node,
> -				&free_vmap_area_root, &free_vmap_area_list);
> -	}
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.20.0
> 
Please do not apply this. It will just break everything. As Roman
pointed we can just set lva = NULL; in the beginning to make GCC happy. 
For some reason GCC decides that it can be used uninitialized, but that
is not true.

--
Vlad Rezki

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-17 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-17 12:14 [BUG]: mm/vmalloc: uninitialized variable access in pcpu_get_vm_areas Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-17 12:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-17 13:49 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-06-17 14:04   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-17 14:04     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-17 14:40     ` Roman Penyaev
2019-06-17 14:12 ` Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
2019-06-17 14:44   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-17 14:44     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-17 14:50     ` Roman Penyaev
2019-06-17 14:50     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-17 14:50       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-17 16:57       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2019-06-17 19:29         ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-17 19:29           ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-18  8:01           ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-18  8:01             ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-18  8:53             ` Uladzislau Rezki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190617141244.5x22nrylw7hodafp@pc636 \
    --to=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rpenyaev@suse.de \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thgarnie@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.