From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB02C31E5D for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 01:59:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E778A2080C for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 01:59:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727626AbfFRB7I (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:59:08 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:37066 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726026AbfFRB7I (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:59:08 -0400 Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hd3Om-0004se-Gu; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 01:59:00 +0000 Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 02:59:00 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Casey Schaufler , James Morris , David Howells , stable , Jose Bollo , LSM List , Linux List Kernel Mailing Subject: Re: [PATCH] Smack: Restore the smackfsdef mount option and add missing prefixes Message-ID: <20190618015900.GZ17978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <155930001303.17253.2447519598157285098.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <17467.1559300202@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <6cfd5113-8473-f962-dee7-e490e6f76f9c@schaufler-ca.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 02:24:09PM -1000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 1:08 PM Casey Schaufler wrote: > > > > Al, are you going to take this, or should I find another way > > to get it in for 5.2? > > I guess I can take it directly. > > I was assuming it would come through either Al (which is how I got the > commit it fixes) or Casey (as smack maintainer), so I ignored the > patch. FWIW, (belated) ACK...