All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ming.lei@redhat.com (Ming Lei)
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] nvme: flush scan_work when resetting controller
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 09:36:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190620013650.GB31179@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190618101025.78840-3-hare@suse.de>

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019@12:10:25PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> When resetting the controller there is no point whatsoever to
> have a scan run in parallel; we cannot access the controller and

scan won't be run in parallel, because .scan_work is embedded in
'struct nvme_ctrl' which is per-HBA.

> we cannot tell which devices are present and which not.
> Additionally we'll run a scan after reset anyway.
> So flush existing scans before reconnecting, ensuring to
> short-circuit the scan workqueue function if the controller state
> isn't live to avoid lockups.

This way may cause dead-lock.

1) nvme_revalidate_disk() might freeze queue in flush context, however
any in-flight requests won't be completed until reset is done, so
deadlock may be caused by flushing scans in reset context.

2) sync IO may be involved in revalidate_disk() which is called in
scan context, so deadlock is caused for same reason with 1).


Thanks,
Ming

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-20  1:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-18 10:10 [PATCH 0/2] nvme: flush rescan worker before resetting Hannes Reinecke
2019-06-18 10:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvme: Do not remove namespaces during reset Hannes Reinecke
2019-06-18 17:30   ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-06-20  1:22   ` Ming Lei
2019-06-18 10:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: flush scan_work when resetting controller Hannes Reinecke
2019-06-18 17:41   ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-06-19  6:22     ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-06-19 16:56       ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-06-19 18:45         ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-06-19 20:04           ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-06-21 16:26             ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-06-24  5:48               ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-06-24  6:13               ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-06-24 18:08                 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-06-24 18:51                   ` James Smart
2019-06-25  6:07                   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-06-25 21:50                     ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-06-26  5:34                       ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-06-26 20:22                         ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-07-02  5:38                           ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-07-02 13:29                             ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-06-20  1:36   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-06-21  6:14     ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-06-21  6:58       ` Ming Lei
2019-06-21  7:59         ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-06-21 17:23           ` James Smart
2019-06-21 17:23           ` James Smart
2019-06-24  3:29           ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190620013650.GB31179@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.