From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C5E3AA5 for ; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 16:02:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48790A8 for ; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 16:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 13:01:54 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Mark Brown Message-ID: <20190630130154.1b5cf991@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: <20190629112055.GB2793@sirena.org.uk> References: <7b73e1b7-cc34-982d-2a9c-acf62b88da16@linuxfoundation.org> <20190628205102.GA3131@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> <20190629112055.GB2793@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Patch version changes in commit logs? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Em Sat, 29 Jun 2019 12:20:55 +0100 Mark Brown escreveu: > On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 09:18:28AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > BTW, can the URL be reached from patchwork? That'd be really handy. > > Even better, could patchwork add it to the mboxes you download from it > like acks and so on? Currently you can get the message ID so it's easy > to construct the link for things that are on LKML. I'm all for it, but the problem with patchwork is that the tool may be used on non-kernel development and/or the ML may not be in lore. Also, there are more than one patchwork instance. We use our own for Linux media (https://patchwork.linuxtv.org)[1]. On media, patchwork is used for both Kernel development and VDR development (an userspace tool) - with is a completely unrelated project (with different people behind it - and even a different mailing list). So, whatever change at patchwork should be done in a way that the ML URL could be customized, and the new field would be added only if the URL is not blank. [1] long story short: back on the initial installs at kernel.org, patchwork didn't preserve IDs, due to some issue between master and mirrors - So, after using it for a while, we were forced to use our own instance that is not replicated. Thanks, Mauro