From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77A487258 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 09:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com (mail-wr1-f67.google.com [209.85.221.67]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B540D70D for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 09:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id p11so13050375wre.7 for ; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 02:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 11:48:26 +0200 From: Andrea Parri To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Message-ID: <20190701094826.GA5144@andrea> References: <7b73e1b7-cc34-982d-2a9c-acf62b88da16@linuxfoundation.org> <20190628205102.GA3131@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> <20190629134329.GA4620@andrea> <20190630163120.GA13925@chatter.i7.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190630163120.GA13925@chatter.i7.local> Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Patch version changes in commit logs? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:31:20PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 05:16:18PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >>Makes all sense to me. One question/remark: > >> > >>Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst says: > >> > >> "If the patch follows from a mailing list discussion, give a URL to the > >> mailing list archive; use the https://lkml.kernel.org/ redirector with > >> a ``Message-Id``, to ensure that the links cannot become stale." > >> > >>and it does not mention "lore.kernel.org": does this doc want an update? > > > >Yes. lkml.kernel.org/r was the initial redirector, but lore is the new > >thing. > > FYI, lkml.kernel.org == lore.kernel.org in all respects. Using > lore.kernel.org/r/ will match *any* mailing list archived at > lore.kernel.org (for the full list, see https://lore.kernel.org/lists.html). > I prefer people use lore.kernel.org because that name doesn't imply that the > search will only match LKML. Thanks for this information, Konstantin. I'm still a bit confused... Consider, e.g., the following discussion: it apparently forgot to include LKML, but the link "works". https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190131234012.3712779-1-ast@kernel.org A last minute change? What am I missing? Thanks, Andrea