From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2501E9F for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 17:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk (heliosphere.sirena.org.uk [172.104.155.198]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75E88880 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 17:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 18:05:15 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Jan Kara Message-ID: <20190703170515.GA3490@sirena.org.uk> References: <37eb32f3-f341-b1d8-293b-c119ae278b4f@linuxfoundation.org> <1562082713.3321.38.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <201907020926.FB19EDEBCC@keescook> <1562103238.3321.66.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1562106408.29304.11.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20190702224347.GJ3032@mit.edu> <20190703085620.GA5007@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <20190703135012.GC2041@mit.edu> <20190703141013.GB16008@quack2.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190703141013.GB16008@quack2.suse.cz> Cc: James Bottomley , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Patch version changes in commit logs? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 04:10:13PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > So I agree in a lot of cases Link tag is going to be useless. OTOH I'm > willing to put up with the useless Link tag for the cases where it does > help - e.g. multiple times I'm been chasing mailing lists to find out > what's the latest posted version of some patch and what other patches are > in the series so that I could backport them as well. And the Link tag would > help with this or even make it possible to automate this to some extent... The other thing with the link tag is that if we can automate generating it it doesn't really cost us anything - it's going to be more effort to decide if it's useful than it is to just add it unconditionally. --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl0c4EgACgkQJNaLcl1U h9C1Jwf8DcSq03BsVJAYRFQ2VFqq2XCWMEw+E0Nls9qOPzxPYJSptCiaQxY6hkHh s06WQmibWKW985OW2PR97A/5oQi12+qRfP1aaS0YBCuk+e7C/Uo29cDR2+v6Nr8r 7Csz25MCszars1CnrYDcERZJhqAlqGZjKPJ7Pju7gXEyHrrnbN9HKvcvOqwSf4cW Y7+JVt6BSRZvkAr1+A4g6P/pmNYeStOs32cl6yD/ulq7urezb6kQCH0conCn/KpN VDwjfl/WUWyH1CrqKMXpnWRjxl5lT10bfWh9hhQlb6KyvIaf30rrHqFNpaqWj4ox mn3c0eh/tTkNkTP4HlKQv1LDzqzCVA== =tnFc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS--