All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/display/tgl: Bump up the mode vertical limits to support 8K
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:24:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190710192414.GD24720@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190710191505.GM5942@intel.com>

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:15:05PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 05:06:13PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > On TGL+ we support 8K display resolution, hence bump up the vertical
> > active limits to 4320 in intel_mode_valid()
> > 
> > v2:
> > * Checkpatch warning (Manasi)
> > 
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 9 +++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > index f07081815b80..cfceb27e4b9e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > @@ -15764,8 +15764,13 @@ intel_mode_valid(struct drm_device *dev,
> >  			   DRM_MODE_FLAG_CLKDIV2))
> >  		return MODE_BAD;
> >  
> > -	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9 ||
> > -	    IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv) || IS_HASWELL(dev_priv)) {
> > +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> > +		hdisplay_max = 8192;
> > +		vdisplay_max = 4320;
> > +		htotal_max = 8192;
> > +		vtotal_max = 8192;
> 
> I wonder if we can safely bump these before we get the joiner stuff sorted.
> Hmm. I guess it should be fine as the limit that is supposed to overcome
> is caused by the cdclk max frequency being too low to allow a single
> pipe to push enough pixels. And since we check that in .mode_valid() we
> shouldn't accidentally start to advertize support for modes we can't do.

Yes the intel_dp_mode_valid() will still reject the modes until we have the support
for big joiner, so allowing these limits should be fine here.

Same for the plane size limits. Plane size limits bumping up is also
needed in case of tiled 8K display with transcdoer port sync

> 
> Which means these limits should actually be higher than this. 16k for
> htotal+hdisplay and 8k for vtotal+vdisplay already on icl I believe.

Where do we set htotal+hdisplay? And I added this for tgl, since we would be
supporting the 8K res only on tgl onwards, correct?

Manasi

> 
> > +	} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9 ||
> > +		   IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv) || IS_HASWELL(dev_priv)) {
> >  		hdisplay_max = 8192; /* FDI max 4096 handled elsewhere */
> >  		vdisplay_max = 4096;
> >  		htotal_max = 8192;
> > -- 
> > 2.19.1
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-10 19:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-09 21:47 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display/tgl: Bump up the mode vertical limits to support 8K Manasi Navare
2019-07-09 21:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/display/tgl: Bump up the plane/fb height " Manasi Navare
2019-07-09 23:07   ` Souza, Jose
2019-07-10 18:57     ` Manasi Navare
2019-07-10 19:18   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-07-10 19:36     ` Manasi Navare
2019-07-09 22:07 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display/tgl: Bump up the mode vertical limits " Patchwork
2019-07-09 22:49 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-07-09 23:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Souza, Jose
2019-07-10 18:57   ` Manasi Navare
2019-07-10  0:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Manasi Navare
2019-07-10 19:15   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-07-10 19:24     ` Manasi Navare [this message]
2019-07-10 19:30       ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-07-10  0:40 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2] drm/i915/display/tgl: Bump up the mode vertical limits to support 8K (rev2) Patchwork
2019-07-11  9:07 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190710192414.GD24720@intel.com \
    --to=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.