* cpufreq-related deadlock warning on recent linux-next
@ 2019-07-10 20:53 Heiner Kallweit
2019-07-11 2:28 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2019-07-10 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Viresh Kumar; +Cc: Linux PM
I just got the following when manually suspending the system with
"systemctl suspend" and waking it up with the power button.
[ 380.203172] Restarting tasks ... done.
[ 380.211714] ============================================
[ 380.211719] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 380.211726] 5.2.0-rc7-next-20190704+ #2 Not tainted
[ 380.211731] --------------------------------------------
[ 380.211737] systemd-sleep/2367 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 380.211745] 0000000043cf69ce (&policy->rwsem){+.+.}, at: refresh_frequency_limits+0x36/0x90
[ 380.211761]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 380.211767] 0000000043cf69ce (&policy->rwsem){+.+.}, at: cpufreq_cpu_acquire+0x25/0x50
[ 380.211777]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 380.211783] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 380.211789] CPU0
[ 380.211792] ----
[ 380.211795] lock(&policy->rwsem);
[ 380.211800] lock(&policy->rwsem);
[ 380.211805]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 380.211811] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 380.211818] 8 locks held by systemd-sleep/2367:
[ 380.211823] #0: 000000000e253e21 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x16b/0x1d0
[ 380.211835] #1: 00000000d0140159 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xfd/0x1c0
[ 380.211846] #2: 00000000383c283a (kn->count#155){.+.+}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0x105/0x1c0
[ 380.211857] #3: 000000007e6f342b (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}, at: pm_suspend.cold+0xd0/0x36a
[ 380.211869] #4: 000000002ee59360 ((pm_chain_head).rwsem){++++}, at: __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x46/0x80
[ 380.211883] #5: 000000003972eb2e (&tz->lock){+.+.}, at: step_wise_throttle+0x3f/0x90
[ 380.211893] #6: 0000000007747f02 (&cdev->lock){+.+.}, at: thermal_cdev_update+0x1e/0x16c
[ 380.211904] #7: 0000000043cf69ce (&policy->rwsem){+.+.}, at: cpufreq_cpu_acquire+0x25/0x50
[ 380.211914]
stack backtrace:
[ 380.211921] CPU: 1 PID: 2367 Comm: systemd-sleep Not tainted 5.2.0-rc7-next-20190704+ #2
[ 380.211929] Hardware name: NA ZBOX-CI327NANO-GS-01/ZBOX-CI327NANO-GS-01, BIOS 5.12 04/26/2018
[ 380.211937] Call Trace:
[ 380.211944] dump_stack+0x70/0xa0
[ 380.211950] __lock_acquire.cold+0xc0/0x206
[ 380.211957] lock_acquire+0x90/0x190
[ 380.211963] ? refresh_frequency_limits+0x36/0x90
[ 380.211970] down_write+0x38/0x80
[ 380.211975] ? refresh_frequency_limits+0x36/0x90
[ 380.211981] refresh_frequency_limits+0x36/0x90
[ 380.211987] ? cpufreq_cpu_get+0x60/0x70
[ 380.211993] ? cpufreq_get_policy+0x5e/0x70
[ 380.212000] ? __module_text_address+0x10/0x60
[ 380.212006] ? is_module_text_address+0x18/0x29
[ 380.212013] ? kernel_text_address+0x3e/0x90
[ 380.212019] ? __kernel_text_address+0x10/0x40
[ 380.212026] ? unwind_get_return_address+0x1c/0x30
[ 380.212034] ? __thaw_task+0x50/0x50
[ 380.212040] ? arch_stack_walk+0xa2/0xf0
[ 380.212046] ? stack_trace_save+0x55/0x80
[ 380.212052] ? alloc_list_entry+0x15/0x60
[ 380.212058] ? __lock_acquire+0x1067/0x1940
[ 380.212064] ? cpufreq_cpu_acquire+0x25/0x50
[ 380.212071] ? down_write+0x38/0x80
[ 380.212076] ? cpufreq_cpu_acquire+0x25/0x50
[ 380.212082] cpufreq_update_policy+0x51/0x70
[ 380.212089] cpufreq_set_cur_state.part.0+0x82/0xa0
[ 380.212096] processor_set_cur_state+0xa1/0x110
[ 380.212102] thermal_cdev_update+0x86/0x16c
[ 380.212108] step_wise_throttle+0x58/0x90
[ 380.212114] handle_thermal_trip+0x80/0x240
[ 380.212120] thermal_zone_device_update.part.0+0x68/0x1a0
[ 380.212127] thermal_pm_notify+0x10f/0x130
[ 380.212133] notifier_call_chain+0x53/0x80
[ 380.212139] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x5f/0x80
[ 380.212146] pm_notifier_call_chain+0x22/0x40
[ 380.212151] pm_suspend.cold+0x341/0x36a
[ 380.212157] state_store+0x7d/0xe0
[ 380.212162] kobj_attr_store+0x33/0x50
[ 380.212168] sysfs_kf_write+0x46/0x60
[ 380.212174] kernfs_fop_write+0x134/0x1c0
[ 380.212181] __vfs_write+0x37/0x70
[ 380.212186] vfs_write+0xdc/0x1d0
[ 380.212191] ksys_write+0x6e/0xf0
[ 380.212196] __x64_sys_write+0x19/0x20
[ 380.212202] do_syscall_64+0x50/0x1a0
[ 380.212209] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[ 380.212216] RIP: 0033:0x7f0fd7e801f8
[ 380.212223] Code: 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb bb 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 8d 05 25 50 0d 00 8b 00 85 c0 75 17 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 60 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 83 ec 28 48 89
[ 380.212238] RSP: 002b:00007ffc3d20f288 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
[ 380.212247] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007f0fd7e801f8
[ 380.212253] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 00007ffc3d20f370 RDI: 0000000000000004
[ 380.212260] RBP: 00007ffc3d20f370 R08: 00007f0fd66a6840 R09: 0000561ed5a28e50
[ 380.212267] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000004
[ 380.212273] R13: 0000561ed5a27290 R14: 0000000000000004 R15: 00007f0fd7f507c0
[ 382.995704] r8169 0000:03:00.0 enp3s0: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: cpufreq-related deadlock warning on recent linux-next
2019-07-10 20:53 cpufreq-related deadlock warning on recent linux-next Heiner Kallweit
@ 2019-07-11 2:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-13 11:24 ` Heiner Kallweit
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2019-07-11 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiner Kallweit; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux PM
On 10-07-19, 22:53, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> I just got the following when manually suspending the system with
> "systemctl suspend" and waking it up with the power button.
>
>
> [ 380.203172] Restarting tasks ... done.
>
> [ 380.211714] ============================================
> [ 380.211719] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
> [ 380.211726] 5.2.0-rc7-next-20190704+ #2 Not tainted
> [ 380.211731] --------------------------------------------
> [ 380.211737] systemd-sleep/2367 is trying to acquire lock:
> [ 380.211745] 0000000043cf69ce (&policy->rwsem){+.+.}, at: refresh_frequency_limits+0x36/0x90
> [ 380.211761]
> but task is already holding lock:
> [ 380.211767] 0000000043cf69ce (&policy->rwsem){+.+.}, at: cpufreq_cpu_acquire+0x25/0x50
> [ 380.211777]
> other info that might help us debug this:
> [ 380.211783] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> [ 380.211789] CPU0
> [ 380.211792] ----
> [ 380.211795] lock(&policy->rwsem);
> [ 380.211800] lock(&policy->rwsem);
> [ 380.211805]
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> [ 380.211811] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
>
> [ 380.211818] 8 locks held by systemd-sleep/2367:
> [ 380.211823] #0: 000000000e253e21 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x16b/0x1d0
> [ 380.211835] #1: 00000000d0140159 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xfd/0x1c0
> [ 380.211846] #2: 00000000383c283a (kn->count#155){.+.+}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0x105/0x1c0
> [ 380.211857] #3: 000000007e6f342b (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}, at: pm_suspend.cold+0xd0/0x36a
> [ 380.211869] #4: 000000002ee59360 ((pm_chain_head).rwsem){++++}, at: __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x46/0x80
> [ 380.211883] #5: 000000003972eb2e (&tz->lock){+.+.}, at: step_wise_throttle+0x3f/0x90
> [ 380.211893] #6: 0000000007747f02 (&cdev->lock){+.+.}, at: thermal_cdev_update+0x1e/0x16c
> [ 380.211904] #7: 0000000043cf69ce (&policy->rwsem){+.+.}, at: cpufreq_cpu_acquire+0x25/0x50
This is already fixed in linux-next few days back. Can you try the
latest stuff again ?
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: cpufreq-related deadlock warning on recent linux-next
2019-07-11 2:28 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2019-07-13 11:24 ` Heiner Kallweit
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2019-07-13 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux PM
On 11.07.2019 04:28, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 10-07-19, 22:53, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> I just got the following when manually suspending the system with
>> "systemctl suspend" and waking it up with the power button.
>>
>>
>> [ 380.203172] Restarting tasks ... done.
>>
>> [ 380.211714] ============================================
>> [ 380.211719] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
>> [ 380.211726] 5.2.0-rc7-next-20190704+ #2 Not tainted
>> [ 380.211731] --------------------------------------------
>> [ 380.211737] systemd-sleep/2367 is trying to acquire lock:
>> [ 380.211745] 0000000043cf69ce (&policy->rwsem){+.+.}, at: refresh_frequency_limits+0x36/0x90
>> [ 380.211761]
>> but task is already holding lock:
>> [ 380.211767] 0000000043cf69ce (&policy->rwsem){+.+.}, at: cpufreq_cpu_acquire+0x25/0x50
>> [ 380.211777]
>> other info that might help us debug this:
>> [ 380.211783] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>>
>> [ 380.211789] CPU0
>> [ 380.211792] ----
>> [ 380.211795] lock(&policy->rwsem);
>> [ 380.211800] lock(&policy->rwsem);
>> [ 380.211805]
>> *** DEADLOCK ***
>>
>> [ 380.211811] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
>>
>> [ 380.211818] 8 locks held by systemd-sleep/2367:
>> [ 380.211823] #0: 000000000e253e21 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x16b/0x1d0
>> [ 380.211835] #1: 00000000d0140159 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xfd/0x1c0
>> [ 380.211846] #2: 00000000383c283a (kn->count#155){.+.+}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0x105/0x1c0
>> [ 380.211857] #3: 000000007e6f342b (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}, at: pm_suspend.cold+0xd0/0x36a
>> [ 380.211869] #4: 000000002ee59360 ((pm_chain_head).rwsem){++++}, at: __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x46/0x80
>> [ 380.211883] #5: 000000003972eb2e (&tz->lock){+.+.}, at: step_wise_throttle+0x3f/0x90
>> [ 380.211893] #6: 0000000007747f02 (&cdev->lock){+.+.}, at: thermal_cdev_update+0x1e/0x16c
>> [ 380.211904] #7: 0000000043cf69ce (&policy->rwsem){+.+.}, at: cpufreq_cpu_acquire+0x25/0x50
>
> This is already fixed in linux-next few days back. Can you try the
> latest stuff again ?
>
linux-next from Jul 12th is fine.
Thanks, Heiner
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-07-13 11:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-07-10 20:53 cpufreq-related deadlock warning on recent linux-next Heiner Kallweit
2019-07-11 2:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-13 11:24 ` Heiner Kallweit
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.